From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262712AbTJYQny (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:43:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262714AbTJYQny (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:43:54 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:38159 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262712AbTJYQnx (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:43:53 -0400 To: Vid Strpic Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: *FAT problem in 2.6.0-test8 References: <20031024103225.GC1046@home.bofhlet.net> <20031024185953.GA9265@win.tue.nl> <87ismdoc2s.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20031025105559.GD1143@home.bofhlet.net> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:43:43 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20031025105559.GD1143@home.bofhlet.net> Message-ID: <87wuatmfnk.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vid Strpic writes: > > It looks like it doesn't conform to Microsoft's or SmartMedia's > > specifications. > > Yes. It will be important to know how it was formated. > > Well, I really don't know if it was formatted when I bought it, 2 years > ago. What puzzles me, is that 2.4 mounts it normally... Yes, 2.4 doesn't check it field. > This is the hex dump of begginning (problematic no-name 64Mb card): > > 0000000: e900 002a 6453 777c 4948 4300 0220 0100 ...*dSw|IHC.. .. > 0000010: 0200 0100 00f8 0c00 2000 0800 3700 0000 ........ ...7... > 0000020: c9f3 0100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ > 0000030: 0000 0000 0000 4641 5431 3220 2020 0000 ......FAT12 .. > 0000040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ > > And this is the SanDisk 32Mb card which mounts normally under 2.6: > > 0000000: e900 0020 2020 2020 2020 2000 0220 0100 ... .. .. > 0000010: 0200 01dd f9f8 0600 1000 0800 2300 0000 ............#... > 0000020: 0000 0000 0000 2900 0000 004e 4f20 4e41 ......)....NO NA > 0000030: 4d45 2020 2020 4641 5431 3220 2020 0000 ME FAT12 .. > 0000040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ On these FAT formats, the target field should be offset 512. > Maybe I should try to reformat the card in the reader? My camera has > 'delete all images' but no 'format card' I'm sorry... Um.. Could you please test to reformat? Of course, do it after backup the your disk image. -- OGAWA Hirofumi