From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Halaney <andrew@amutable.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the origin tree
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 09:03:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0boxxvk.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <attxYMtvBc5AMf9U@sirena.co.uk>
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the jc_docs tree got a conflict in:
>
> tools/lib/python/kdoc/xforms_lists.py
>
> between commit:
>
> fd0349aadbb99 ("pid: add helpers to operate on a struct pid array")
>
> from the origin tree and commit:
>
> 4180abdb5d938 ("docs: xforms_lists: Handle DECLARE_KHOSER_PTR() struct members")
>
> from the jc_docs tree.
Interesting...I'm a little surprised to see Christian's change to the
kerneldoc tooling for the first time ... oh well.
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc tools/lib/python/kdoc/xforms_lists.py
> index 320f977c5bac2,161acac90ea3b..0000000000000
> --- a/tools/lib/python/kdoc/xforms_lists.py
> +++ b/tools/lib/python/kdoc/xforms_lists.py
> @@@ -45,7 -45,7 +45,8 @@@ class CTransforms
> (CMatch("DECLARE_HASHTABLE"), r"unsigned long \1[1 << ((\2) - 1)]"),
> (CMatch("DECLARE_KFIFO"), r"\2 *\1"),
> (CMatch("DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR"), r"\2 *\1"),
> + (CMatch("DECLARE_KHOSER_PTR"), r"\2 \1"),
> + (CMatch("DECLARE_PIDS"), r"struct pid *\1[(\2) + 1]"),
> (CMatch("(?:__)?DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY"), r"\1 \2[]"),
> (CMatch("DEFINE_DMA_UNMAP_ADDR"), r"dma_addr_t \1"),
The resolution is fine, of course.
Thanks,
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 14:38 Mark Brown
2026-10-23 15:03 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-26 16:42 Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0boxxvk.fsf@trenco.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=andrew@amutable.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®