From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com (sendmail.purelymail.com [34.202.193.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0735A18C008 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=34.202.193.197 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789363950; cv=none; b=ebPginZxXq4h3FUvD7TJY9mhvGljsaqwnjXewT3Mqsb51kb2s36n8fFmnvV3nnCta8RgM9VrdBzqIO2MpjvkVgj7nCjXQHuSqPKQmxD+cuNGA5HK+5vpUQzrOmpWe3+diF7dXniNDYM3VoPPZOXGarLYN/P0TyZuo4Xfih5Fu8M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789363950; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JLDyb1EJ9pEsBiZ5e7lfY4A4KF9zkpRjkgHJql1+FZ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=utJXzW0uvFA1etEqnFq+ST0bCJFPRGARJlYx1A8m2bfTuov3DqoZISGxPw4PEV7FRRdYTuhquaLe0aRLANC3s0QNz79/C5duFVfvmVQw4YlcUYS+Xpoz4hJoWaWdPvgyHMaAbm2Qio5Osg96lnsKcSCww1Xkzk5szeYsvnEk0ws= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=korsgaard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=korsgaard.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purelymail.com header.i=@purelymail.com header.b=w85p4Pr3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=34.202.193.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=korsgaard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=korsgaard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purelymail.com header.i=@purelymail.com header.b="w85p4Pr3" DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=w85p4Pr3vyldw4Fn6aC2IMeeVGCMdPXlbQ6qMWqjfg6UUbAvjK5maYPauleA5x1QkmRZ1OmJFg50vk7V0D002rY1wM9KHAhXiAaMS5me4FCO5QfpWFQ6H+JHQVyWI286svJga8ljF4VlVmuJ8EVxxMsgY58eRmSzVnQCSJMeeimFGFyxKcQ++EIWLV6Hxzc8ggK2I3jbGyKcptpt5iImW9beQJbsXYB0TiV3aTcG75JAje/jIDK6hRpOQRWV1jImxy9FJ/T9rgaQeqVUarYccw9VuKiuWmMm/7JPYHkEzflOJVjMN4QYzbvDisg7UqBMUYgbopnIFB7+V71ePrVp0g==; s=purelymail1; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=JLDyb1EJ9pEsBiZ5e7lfY4A4KF9zkpRjkgHJql1+FZ4=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; Feedback-ID: 21632:4007:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id -1229845082; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peko by dell.be.48ers.dk with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x5zIT-0000000Fmcu-3VsK; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:32:05 +0200 From: Peter Korsgaard To: Marek Vasut Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Michal Simek , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: zynqmp: Add ifm ZynqMP VHIP6 EvalBoard In-Reply-To: <00acb35f-ea7c-465c-96da-4eb5dac9e2cc@nabladev.com> (Marek Vasut's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2026 03:55:28 +0200") References: <20260909182641.165383-1-marex@nabladev.com> <20260909182641.165383-2-marex@nabladev.com> <874ifwjff2.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <87wlspb50g.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <00acb35f-ea7c-465c-96da-4eb5dac9e2cc@nabladev.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:32:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87y0d4v1nu.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> "Marek" == Marek Vasut writes: Hi, >> OK, but why not add all the referenced GPIOs if you fill out >> gpio-line-names anyway? > Because the userspace depends only on this one line name. But since > eeprom node contains wp-gpios DT property now and the kernel controls > the nWP GPIO, I can also turn this around and drop the gpio-line-names > entirely. What do you think ? Up to you. I personally find it helpful for debugging (E.G. the debugfs output), but if it isn't used at all... -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard