From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81D82FB088; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757088474; cv=none; b=QrqOsud9CI7STAU9DiQ3X33txsS0IiqFAWBb/QmXGgrfid2eFtGi/ECF3oVUMs5TtiMzfh+nBVTohYN79AYsoxyzKoM71saMlqwtA7CFEi6PiNckuNWvAp5Z0HC4+R4QZerOsfA7bs5iQD6Gb3zergX3LVrhTv+qXTvqoKHnBjs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757088474; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CrEGoLHeKAa/3bmAVgUctG+2h2cqCuQQe1zAIfhKWqs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OBjruHy6MNbeoOQUGg2/PCtU28v+PK5W4cJD4qDrOSVexyjOwsoEphnsr7nGOKpKdHehaprH2finyH5znQEUTRoG1MpVW54e04xIPm43GGJL5EPcOV4r6TV+e1uy/YATG+8fL1RNas7FZ7ekSSxQWl4gwmU068j2QRlQ7S34MgY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=XrwoeG1R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="XrwoeG1R" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net D0A1E406FA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1757088472; bh=MhRcSq3uykxG80tiXwZXUen4ZgycreTBqZrOfDqe0xo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XrwoeG1RSZCyE5u1ygzy0XN4Cirxf27I0ZcOBq0idckEOPIGZ+G+L+cJhp2UwN1Fi TA3tNPTspJjek4CdXARqwT1CtU4Ju2l9NJcwjtzT6iokSjLam/VkBZi2IbC6gyIjZ9 2DRadNz9Cr2347Ssk6yJ1DOkGmZKKkrFe3VIvGoDG884HvoHPDGLrUe5xFp7faMX58 zHlyItpDFIDgDdzXF+fNw0VPh/675+KTzE2Al4+HBhCNgmTcp1wZ7CywE3M3e8ipQn kAPfC3W2WN7Cdqm4w8myyItvQtNgkOoKCTjchQ94FDoQeb5dkn9Rhp+sCz/Egi7IjX UTXUYIhImmYEQ== Received: from localhost (c-73-14-55-248.hsd1.co.comcast.net [73.14.55.248]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0A1E406FA; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:07:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/19] Split sphinx call logic from docs Makefile In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 10:07:51 -0600 Message-ID: <87y0qskhm0.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > This series does a major cleanup at docs Makefile by moving the > actual doc build logic to a helper script (scripts/sphinx-build-wrapper). > > Such script was written in a way that it can be called either > directly or via a makefile. When running via makefile, it will > use GNU jobserver to ensure that, when sphinx-build is > called, the number of jobs will match at most what it is > specified by the "-j" parameter. I will try to make another pass over this stuff later today. I would really appreciate some more eyes on it, though, and perhaps even some reports of testing. This is a significant change, and the presence of surprised would not be ... surprising ... Thanks, jon