From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Yu\, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>, "Shankar\,
Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/fpu] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new functions for clearing fpregs and xstates
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 20:00:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2c28zir.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10a553a5-699f-6921-705e-9afa1a8e42de@intel.com>
On Tue, May 25 2021 at 10:44, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> On 5/24/2021 9:34 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> So I'm guessing that syzbot may have misattributed the problem. But
>> we definitely need to clean up the XRSTOR #GP handling before CET
>> lands.
>>
> From the crash dump, the system is doing syscall_exit_to_user_mode()
> for __x64_sys_futex(). The futex syscall does not seem to modify
> xstates,
Of course does the futex syscall not modify anything, but the task can
schedule out before returning from the syscall so it has to restore the
FPU state.
> but upon returning to user mode, XRSTORS gets a GP. Can this
> be some memory corruption? fpu__clear() is merely helping to clear the
> mess and seems to be innocent.
What kind of analysis is that?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 14:54 [PATCH v4 00/10] Support XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Rename validate_xstate_header() to validate_user_xstate_header() Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Fenghua Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new macros for supervisor and user xstates Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Fenghua Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Separate user and supervisor xfeatures mask Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new functions for clearing fpregs and xstates Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Fenghua Yu
2021-05-24 16:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-25 17:44 ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-05-25 18:00 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-11-29 11:19 ` Ivan Zahariev
2022-11-29 18:16 ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-01 12:58 ` Ivan Zahariev
2022-12-01 14:04 ` Dave Hansen
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Update sanitize_restored_xstate() for supervisor xstates Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Update copy_kernel_to_xregs_err() for XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] x86/fpu/xstate: Update copy_kernel_to_xregs_err() for " tip-bot2 for Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] x86/fpu: Introduce copy_supervisor_to_kernel() Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Preserve supervisor states for slow path of __fpu__restore_sig() Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] x86/fpu/xstate: Preserve supervisor states for the slow path in __fpu__restore_sig() tip-bot2 for Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Restore supervisor states for signal return Yu-cheng Yu
2020-05-16 15:10 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2c28zir.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®