From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Count filtered entries to total period also
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:35:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y52256n7.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123133847.GB1180@krava.brq.redhat.com> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:38:48 +0100")
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:38:48 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:28:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Currently if a sample was filtered by command line option, it just
>> dropped. But this affects final output in that the percentage can be
>> different since the filtered entries were not included to the total.
>>
>> But user might want to see the original percentages when filter
>> applied so change the behavior depends on a new symbol_conf.filter_
>> relative value in order to be controlled by user later.
>
> SNIP
>
>> + al->filtered |= (1 << HIST_FILTER__SYMBOL);
>>
>> -out_filtered:
>> - al->filtered = true;
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> index e4e6249b87d4..73b999448932 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> @@ -13,13 +13,6 @@ static bool hists__filter_entry_by_thread(struct hists *hists,
>> static bool hists__filter_entry_by_symbol(struct hists *hists,
>> struct hist_entry *he);
>>
>> -enum hist_filter {
>> - HIST_FILTER__DSO,
>> - HIST_FILTER__THREAD,
>> - HIST_FILTER__PARENT,
>> - HIST_FILTER__SYMBOL,
>> -};
>
> it striked me that al.filtered is duplicating he.filtered, so I thought
> we could leave just the one in hist_entry.. now I see annotate, diff
> and others use al.filtered to skip hist_entry adding/processing
>
> I think there's use for relative/total switch in other places,
> and we could actually get rid of the al.filtered and make
> the relative switch global (also in config?) .. in the future ;-)
Okay, as I wrote in the series description, it only changed perf report
part. I'll make the necessary change to other parts in the next version.
>
>> -
>> struct callchain_param callchain_param = {
>> .mode = CHAIN_GRAPH_REL,
>> .min_percent = 0.5,
>> @@ -329,8 +322,9 @@ void hists__inc_nr_entries(struct hists *hists, struct hist_entry *h)
>> if (!h->filtered) {
>> hists__calc_col_len(hists, h);
>> ++hists->nr_entries;
>> - hists->stats.total_period += h->stat.period;
>> }
>> + if (!h->filtered || !symbol_conf.filter_relative)
>> + hists->stats.total_period += h->stat.period;
>
> also we could keep both counts and easily switch on in tui/gui
> .. in the future ;-)
Will do.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-22 23:28 [PATCHSET 0/5] perf tools: Update on filtered entries' percentage output (v3) Namhyung Kim
2014-01-22 23:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Count filtered entries to total period also Namhyung Kim
2014-01-23 13:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-01-27 5:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-01-23 13:38 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-01-27 5:35 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2014-01-22 23:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf ui/tui: Add support for showing relative percentage Namhyung Kim
2014-01-22 23:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf report: Add --percentage option Namhyung Kim
2014-01-22 23:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf report: Add report.percentage config option Namhyung Kim
2014-01-22 23:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Show absolute percentage by default Namhyung Kim
2014-01-23 14:24 ` Jiri Olsa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-14 4:43 [PATCHSET 0/5] perf tools: Update on filtered entries' percentage output Namhyung Kim
2014-01-14 4:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Count filtered entries to total period also Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y52256n7.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome