From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Guillaume Gaudonville" <gaudonville@6wind.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, serge.hallyn@canonical.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
davem@davemloft.net, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
Guillaume Gaudonville <guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] ns: do not allocate a new nsproxy at each call
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:40:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y55u1ip2.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381858522-21341-1-git-send-email-guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com> (Guillaume Gaudonville's message of "Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:35:22 +0200")
"Guillaume Gaudonville" <gaudonville@6wind.com> writes:
> Currently, at each call of setns system call a new nsproxy is allocated,
> the old nsproxy namespaces are copied into the new one and the old nsproxy
> is freed if the task was the only one to use it.
>
> It can creates large delays on hardware with large number of cpus since
> to free a nsproxy a synchronize_rcu() call is done.
>
> When a task is the only one to use a nsproxy, only the task can do an action
> that will make this nsproxy to be shared by another task or thread (fork,...).
> So when the refcount of the nsproxy is equal to 1, we can simply update the
> current nsproxy field without allocating a new one and freeing the old one.
>
> The install operations of each kind of namespace cannot fails, so there's no
> need to check for an error and calling ops->install().
>
> Tested on TileGX (36 cores) and Intel (32 cores).
This may be worth doing (I am a little scared of a design that has setns
on a fast path) but right now this isn't safe.
Currently pidns_install ends with:
put_pid_ns(nsproxy->pid_ns_for_children);
nsproxy->pid_ns_for_children = get_pid_ns(new);
return 0;
And netns_install ends with:
put_net(nsproxy->net_ns);
nsproxy->net_ns = get_net(net);
return 0;
The put before the set is not atomic and is not safe unless
the nsproxy is private. I think this is fixable but it requires a more
indepth look at the code than you have done.
Mind if I ask where this comes up?
> Reported-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Gaudonville <guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com>
> ---
> kernel/nsproxy.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> index afc0456..afc04ac 100644
> --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
> +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setns, int, fd, int, nstype)
> if (nstype && (ops->type != nstype))
> goto out;
>
> + /*
> + * If count == 1, only the current task can increment it,
> + * by doing a fork for example so we can safely update the
> + * current nsproxy pointers without allocate a new one,
> + * update it and destroy the old one
> + */
> + if (atomic_read(&tsk->nsproxy->count) == 1) {
> + err = ops->install(tsk->nsproxy, ei->ns);
> + fput(file);
> + return err;
> + }
As a minor nit, but to match the rest of the code in this function that
should read:
> + if (atomic_read(&tsk->nsproxy->count) == 1) {
> + err = ops->install(tsk->nsproxy, ei->ns);
> + goto out;
> + }
There is no need to add an additional exit point to reason about.
> +
> new_nsproxy = create_new_namespaces(0, tsk, current_user_ns(), tsk->fs);
> if (IS_ERR(new_nsproxy)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(new_nsproxy);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 17:35 Guillaume Gaudonville
2013-10-15 18:40 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2013-10-16 8:48 ` Guillaume Gaudonville
2013-10-16 19:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-10-18 14:46 ` [RFC PATCH linux-next v2] " Guillaume Gaudonville
2013-10-18 22:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-10-22 15:52 ` Guillaume Gaudonville
2013-10-22 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-22 18:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-10-22 19:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-10-22 21:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-23 8:27 ` Guillaume Gaudonville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y55u1ip2.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gaudonville@6wind.com \
--cc=guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome