mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	arnaldo.melo@gmail.com,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/8] Annotation weekly ponies delivery
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:13:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5or1x7l.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87liksd5wi.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (Namhyung Kim's message of "Wed, 16 May 2012 14:57:49 +0900")

Hi,

On Wed, 16 May 2012 14:57:49 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> In fact, my perf stat -g was already broken - it cannot count at
> all on my SNB box. I'll investigate it more.
>

It's like a matter of the number of the hw counters. The perf stat -g
uses 6 hw events, but I can use up to 5 hw events on my SNB machine:

$ ./perf stat -g -e cycles,cache-references,cache-misses,instructions,branches sleep 1

 Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':

           999,008 cycles                    #    0.000 GHz                    
            10,963 cache-references                                            
             2,630 cache-misses              #   23.990 % of all cache refs    
           635,225 instructions              #    0.64  insns per cycle        
           128,014 branches                                                    

       1.001466421 seconds time elapsed


But I adding branch-misses event outputs:

 Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':

     <not counted> cycles                  
     <not counted> cache-references        
     <not counted> cache-misses            
     <not counted> instructions            
     <not counted> branches                
     <not counted> branch-misses           

       1.000742533 seconds time elapsed


However adding ref-cycles is fine (Is it related to fixed counters?):

 Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':

         1,027,263 cycles                    #    0.000 GHz                    
            12,435 cache-references                                            
             2,747 cache-misses              #   22.091 % of all cache refs    
           650,100 instructions              #    0.63  insns per cycle        
           130,765 branches                                                    
         2,367,488 ref-cycles                                                  

       1.001557088 seconds time elapsed


BTW, dmesg says I have 7, but a counter was taken by NMI watchdog:

$ dmesg | grep -A32 Performance
[    0.137227] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, 16-deep LBR, SandyBridge events, Intel PMU driver.
[    0.137232] ... version:                3
[    0.137233] ... bit width:              48
[    0.137234] ... generic registers:      4
[    0.137235] ... value mask:             0000ffffffffffff
[    0.137236] ... max period:             000000007fffffff
[    0.137237] ... fixed-purpose events:   3
[    0.137238] ... event mask:             000000070000000f
[    0.143371] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.149251] Booting Node   0, Processors  #1
[    0.162396] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.166265]  #2
[    0.179401] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.183263]  #3
[    0.196399] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.200263]  #4
[    0.213398] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.217268]  #5
[    0.230404] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.234263]  #6
[    0.247402] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.251268]  #7
[    0.264405] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.268266]  #8
[    0.281403] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.285268]  #9
[    0.298405] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.302264]  #10
[    0.315401] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.319266]  #11 Ok.
[    0.332404] NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[    0.332435] Brought up 12 CPUs
[    0.332437] Total of 12 processors activated (76799.44 BogoMIPS).


Thanks,
Namhyung

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-17  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-12 19:52 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf annotate: Use raw form for register indirect call instructions Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf annotate: Resolve symbols using objdump comment Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf annotate: Resolve symbols using objdump comment for single op ins Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf annotate: Augment lock instruction output Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf annotate: Introduce ->free() method in ins_ops Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf annotate browser: Count the numbers of jump sources to a target Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf annotate browser: Show 'jumpy' functions Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 19:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf annotate browser: Add key bindings help window Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 20:40 ` [GIT PULL 0/8] Annotation weekly ponies delivery Linus Torvalds
2012-05-12 21:25   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-12 22:29     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-14  7:05       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-14 11:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-14 11:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-14 15:06       ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-15  4:48         ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-15 10:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 14:44           ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-15 17:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-16  5:57               ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-16  8:19                 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-17  0:13                 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y5or1x7l.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®