mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
To: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>,
	wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k becon loss messages
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:04:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y6uexie4.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904061056.28495.helmut.schaa@gmail.com> (Helmut Schaa's message of "Mon\, 6 Apr 2009 10\:56\:27 +0200")

Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> writes:

>> > NetworkManager typically scans every 120 seconds and I can also trigger
>> > the messages by a manual scan with iwlist. I did not dig any further but
>> > the messages seem to appear right at the end of the scan. Tried with iwlagn
>> > and both sw_scan and hw_scan.
>> 
>> Thanks, this was valuable info. It might be that my beacon filtering
>> patches broke something related to scanning and beacon loss check. I'll
>> take a look at this.
>
> Maybe you did not break anything. During a scan we will stay away from the
> operating channel for some seconds which indeed prevents us from receiving
> beacons. I'd say sending a probe request to the AP in that case won't hurt.

Yeah, but it's ugly. And if the scan takes too long, for example over
four seconds, mlme would disconnect from AP. That's not good.

But I haven't looked at this in detail yet, just speculating here :)

-- 
Kalle Valo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-06  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-05  9:23 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-05  9:29 ` Michael Buesch
2009-04-05  9:36   ` Michael Buesch
2009-04-05 10:03     ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-05 11:00     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-05  9:52   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-05 10:13     ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-06  7:14       ` Helmut Schaa
2009-04-06  8:17         ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-06  8:56           ` Helmut Schaa
2009-04-06  9:04             ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2009-04-06 10:17         ` Michael Buesch
2009-04-06 10:23           ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-06 10:51             ` Helmut Schaa
2009-04-06 11:05               ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-06 15:18                 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-06 18:00                   ` John W. Linville
2009-04-07  5:54                     ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-07 13:53                       ` John W. Linville
2009-04-07 15:19                         ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y6uexie4.fsf@litku.valot.fi \
    --to=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
    --cc=Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®