From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 556C9379C35 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790670157; cv=none; b=KhrPBuoWqbARgNd+VdQcKDSM+7VKi20SMSpIcVMIbYYXWkbB/7GaHIZJ7PdUi8I9IEiCHDOKK5FTsqVCIcP+LsAIsiZPrX7QGHgpydzpnbp2pbe4yHGwBs3tuggnkDYnm5n1SxtW+1OwJOdUGgXq2TuZiFmzRaHodRWTdmrQ9I8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790670157; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xxToONBdMXP+sQAcFMni1Xsp9MTpztNPlXZGUQfNC94=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HVBHO1T85o1Hv+5sbJZhddK6ZDANPkUTE4HKN6iYY5XiaHnsZZmgpxM4cncOjz16TK6E36B/rcIyASdd/f5g8ap9xnG/IPR1p2nsLcCJg8LF3N5TRhDcOp35ItgnthvZ4c9CLWnG1mOW8HrpV33rrAmRan2cxddIra7r9XlYNVA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lpwmUCK5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lpwmUCK5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D92231F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:22:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790670156; bh=HTTndInTl8yksiJFhCcVpCQ/4fHg+TLd3FozuAv6AaA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=lpwmUCK5oNbHHqii/0jy5xPhlRhchmakLYO0GeHojTZ0QRCzM5/wmVN/K6L3Gy4m3 Pw6oHY8C1NR4DnClCHtgc08ogxZbexSxXYuPCPnhXOeuFYpSdfZBEJ9ly8yVRtuJ2L nGY+76bCjPPUGQBk77XlqEaAz/GBBbUbU8qH3kj1zrfhFQYH1D1n+my/trR5G9b6pM 2KbR08YMnHQ/QMyoGnHo6FA1VtFa2HQp3Uq9oShfGuAw74611HReVLunjMU4Q1+6IR bZTZCFFzZGtjDXBr2viggJdhXGxNhyB/5XK8PWCReMuec7Jo/BDIPL2MeXhWd0flit zBGToIpC4qoww== From: Thomas Gleixner To: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Almeida , dave@stgolabs.net, dvhart@infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Almeida Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Handle the correct robust list at compat_exit_robust_list() In-Reply-To: <20260922005407.522060-1-andrealmeid@igalia.com> References: <20260922005407.522060-1-andrealmeid@igalia.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:22:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87zex0ii0t.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 21 2026 at 21:54, Andr=C3=A9 Almeida wrote: > compat_exit_robust_list(), as exit_robust_list(), should handle the robust > list from the task_struct from the function argument, not the current task > running the function. > > Fixes: 2cb5251d3d64 ("futex: Provide UABI defines for robust list entry m= odifiers") It actually fixes nothing because *curr is always current. I'd rather get rid of the argument alltogether because that's just a source of confusion. Thanks, tglx