From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC21C29D29F; Mon, 25 May 2026 20:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779740532; cv=none; b=Upl7KmodEBj8HXCh8SfNY1lANwP9sTqIHYu5/BcN+eKHfLQ/TGPRTjNGO+uF2LbfIZUlhlrAhkM3Ou6kceGIQ0BWBquMYPb66eZGGA3ESlq6fgUpgewmhLjHbCer7B0+rHdLoGSL7yTy1Q2Jl6rC79hyauWcwRfqjIkOAgPR5DA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779740532; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IodBNjASylY6YOFuqoCqPYJgyrvior+rJJSdcGAap14=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=S2M6z9golzQvvMsZgPXpxZEaWSWzBmTF7BEZkSAhuaB+BbvhISX2k3cng1H9B218nI0UtvRA1WIkhOwHBRxpWstJ6KqrJAR/WoyLAqLb9c7Vq+ZuqejYsiqaziq6ra6F7bGS9avLc21JbXdcWsa1eskyIgTGoYdv6E83/VHVRbI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=fyoEU8ZC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="fyoEU8ZC" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3127140B0C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1779740531; bh=RWviewJkQIKaj9NQsEOpwuAmrm/WAC4wnc2Ra638X+Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=fyoEU8ZCSZD8iBOyUL4U5EUWdU2Zo3O6D99ARk9s7eBIHlGWCryHHcaC9jJzuoOhG C5veZbHKbreeYkE53Tg+MSOnJ9ZJONoMV00p+favsVv5yOWn4xhjdSwMad/X/fHhl1 WMQfRyQU71wmjBMZTDjIuZVbJWE7VAvE2F1aw6lzqaz4pL/pjfxLEoltKJ6YZtvXFM OTPGBI4vuV1HnUM1w7mVvistuyN/XGby4MyLKbNZVC49d+LidEeIrV38h0tqJyd0FK pN2EvhU/smfYfcouGTwf4hltBWqR9GSF3yj1mvXmK4pqzD0pFw1dF3h0w66vaYEDJ5 EhUxO0DdHlY0w== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3127140B0C; Mon, 25 May 2026 20:22:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Sakurai Shun , Shuah Khan Cc: Sakurai Shun , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: fix typo in list.rst In-Reply-To: <20260517040714.8024-1-ssh1326@icloud.com> References: <20260517040714.8024-1-ssh1326@icloud.com> Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 14:22:10 -0600 Message-ID: <87zf1nz1cd.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sakurai Shun writes: > Replace "reinitalizes" with "reinitializes" > > Signed-off-by: Sakurai Shun > --- > Documentation/core-api/list.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/list.rst b/Documentation/core-api/list.rst > index 241464ca0..4819343a2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/core-api/list.rst > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/list.rst > @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ This is because list_splice() did not reinitialize the list_head it took > entries from, leaving its pointer pointing into what is now a different list. > > If we want to avoid this situation, list_splice_init() can be used. It does the > -same thing as list_splice(), except reinitalizes the donor list_head after the > +same thing as list_splice(), except reinitializes the donor list_head after the > transplant. This one was fixed a month ago; please work against docs-next (or linux-next) when generating patches. Thanks, jon