From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB857201255; Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750625735; cv=none; b=TxbdHFz1VVzzMGZwRvRBzibTfE4XMAEZJ9aZflqtUDJmFe5Ssx0dH9AxpYpfoPRdjNw2Hm0L3iF1ljCxJaY5BEcFQtiM+eS+zg+1oObM7uXUPBpPKqoW+VllddGwsuNVU+VlYhoHH4Co5aYiP+2S3bxdmu1ltNmhL68QQ6AbaCA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750625735; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cUlskOZZ2V3yaqs17+9o3shdtVZ1TSTHvIvCHmB7Z3E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UA/qIbp2exqbv2gC6+wqtvxhngX+rSgHAjo331mFPVjFb96xrVJPywvAlADj87WM6ebInZLEoASPCIcS5t9RtKJCRqyPSk+puA9EvdcNLVgnn6QI97LlfknrkIzv3e3nStw8Nc9va1PCK4SfojfvroRG6cMuE3tSkihnfF8fADY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Tfv7RGx3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Tfv7RGx3" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2088D40AA9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1750625727; bh=Rl+Jgbv6QLfnBpMCWu0zqY2zuTKGvPoSkWwkQcZUwtU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Tfv7RGx3INFZPx9oN3SDXRYgkwaUmMRB1QgtzBctw1nxn72C1IvER2LVWw0yQp9hD I3NnCxiEpjhHmpZ/YDWYnUiEBCtlrt7ppoFgvx1JiTiNA9/U3S4UtlcJYBbaLeKvp3 2ctXTOTgxnuNAkLLRdQ/HidcT55lqeI2lRBitSz367eWR/WX6mmAFl8c42PT0O4fpy hNQqccxOvBOBcvMrajX9Rw7vOzbHVjWe0sRNDGWeobRtQRcimESjfOjAx/GbC4X/Ad aVRz56HAzKQw74mVkvnRRvJ1hQ9xXyHpsh6KObBxP6KZcm7Dd+Wh8EVBNSeWeCT3E5 RaaETm13ojMmQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2088D40AA9; Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:55:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Akira Yokosawa , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/15] docs: conf.py: several coding style fixes In-Reply-To: <063c106d96e86ca30c3266f7819f30b7247881ed.1750571906.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> References: <063c106d96e86ca30c3266f7819f30b7247881ed.1750571906.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:55:26 -0600 Message-ID: <87zfdza43l.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > conf.py is missing a SPDX header and doesn't really have > a proper python coding style. It also has an obsolete > commented LaTeX syntax that doesn't work anymore. > > Clean it up a little bit with some help from autolints > and manual adjustments. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > --- > Documentation/conf.py | 351 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+), 179 deletions(-) This file is definitely getting out of hand...:) I notice a lot of the changes are just from 'single quotes' to "double quotes". That adds a lot of churn; is there a reason for it? Thanks, jon