From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/17] signal: Only set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT if it is not already set
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:09:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfrhfu9j.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o77xinmt.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:04:42 -0500")
The various code paths that set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT optimize away setting
JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT and calling signal_wake_up based on different
conditions. If the task has already committed itself to exiting by
setting JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT, setting JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT will accomplish
nothing. So instead of using any of the original conditions only set
JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT when JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT is not set.
Additionally skip task_clear_jobctl_pending once JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT has
been set as task_set_jobctl_pending won't set any pending bits after
that.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/coredump.c | 4 ++--
kernel/exit.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/signal.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
index f3e363fa09a3..bcef41ec69a9 100644
--- a/fs/coredump.c
+++ b/fs/coredump.c
@@ -371,8 +371,8 @@ static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code)
start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
for_each_thread(start, t) {
- task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
- if (!(t->flags & PF_POSTCOREDUMP)) {
+ if (!(t->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
+ task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
t->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
signal_wake_up(t, 1);
}
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 0059c60946a3..73eb3afbf083 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -801,7 +801,10 @@ static void synchronize_group_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, long code)
struct signal_struct *signal = tsk->signal;
spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
- tsk->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
+ if (!(tsk->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
+ task_clear_jobctl_pending(tsk, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
+ tsk->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
+ }
signal->quick_threads--;
if ((signal->quick_threads == 0) &&
!(signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)) {
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 12e552a35848..341717c6cc97 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -911,8 +911,10 @@ static bool prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, bool force)
if (signal->core_state && (sig == SIGKILL)) {
struct task_struct *dumper =
signal->core_state->dumper.task;
- dumper->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
- signal_wake_up(dumper, 1);
+ if (!(dumper->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
+ dumper->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
+ signal_wake_up(dumper, 1);
+ }
}
/*
* The process is in the middle of dying, drop the signal.
@@ -1054,9 +1056,11 @@ static void complete_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, enum pid_type type)
signal->group_exit_code = sig;
signal->group_stop_count = 0;
__for_each_thread(signal, t) {
- task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
- t->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
- signal_wake_up(t, 1);
+ if (!(t->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)) {
+ task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
+ t->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
+ signal_wake_up(t, 1);
+ }
}
return;
}
@@ -1378,12 +1382,13 @@ int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p)
p->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
for_other_threads(p, t) {
- task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
count++;
- /* Don't bother with already dead threads */
- if (t->exit_state)
+ /* Only bother with threads that might be alive */
+ if (t->jobctl & JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT)
continue;
+
+ task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
t->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
signal_wake_up(t, 1);
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-09 14:23 [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 10:50 ` Q: css_task_iter_advance() && dying_tasks Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 11:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-10 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 15:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-13 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-15 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-17 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 3:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:04 ` [PATCH 0/17] exit: complete synchronize_group_exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] signal: Make SIGKILL during coredumps an explicit special case Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 15:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 5:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-21 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 16:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] signal: Compute the process exit_code in get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 03/17] coredump: Consolidate the work to allow SIGKILL during coredumps Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 04/17] signal: In get_signal call do_exit when it is unnecessary to shoot down threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 05/17] signal: Bring down all threads when handling a non-coredump fatal signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 06/17] signal: Add JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT to mark exiting tasks Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 07/17] signal: Always set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT for " Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-30 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 08/17] signal: Don't target tasks that are exiting Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` [PATCH 09/17] signal: Test for process exit or de_thread using task_exit_pending Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2024-06-19 4:10 ` [PATCH 11/17] signal: Make individual tasks exiting a first class concept Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:10 ` [PATCH 12/17] signal: Remove zap_other_threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 13/17] signal: Stop skipping current in do_group_exit & get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-28 5:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 14/17] signal: Factor out schedule_group_exit_locked Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 15/17] ptrace: Separate task->ptrace_code out from task->exit_code Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 16/17] signal: Record the exit_code when an exit is scheduled Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:13 ` [PATCH 17/17] signal: Set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT when all tasks have decided to exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 20:18 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfrhfu9j.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®