mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	eranian@google.com, vincent.weaver@maine.edu,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: System crash with perf_fuzzer (kernel: 5.0.0-rc3)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:39:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhrhzxpo.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130183648.GA24233@krava> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:36:48 +0100")

Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> writes:
>
> the patch adds check_eriod pmu callback.. I need to check if there's
> better way to do this, but so far it fixes the crash for me
>
> if you guys could check this patch, that'd be great

There's already a limit_period callback, perhaps that could
be extended. But ok, can do it this way too.

I suspect there are some other cases that need this callback, not
just BTS, e.g. the checks in hsw_hw_config


-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-30 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-25  6:46 Ravi Bangoria
2019-01-25 15:11 ` Vince Weaver
2019-01-25 16:00 ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-31  7:58   ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-01-31 13:00     ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-31 20:27   ` Cong Wang
2019-01-31 20:39     ` Andi Kleen
2019-03-06 23:09   ` Pavel Machek
2019-01-30 18:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-30 20:39   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2019-01-30 22:33     ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-31  7:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-31  8:27   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-01  7:43     ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-01  7:54       ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-02-02  3:24         ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-02-02 10:34           ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-01 16:27       ` Vince Weaver
2019-02-01 17:38         ` Jiri Olsa
2019-02-02 17:58           ` Vince Weaver
2019-02-04 12:35             ` [PATCH] perf: Add check_period pmu callback Jiri Olsa
2019-02-11 10:11               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 13:22               ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback tip-bot for Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zhrhzxpo.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome