From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965304AbdJRMXD (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:23:03 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:39713 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934220AbdJRMXC (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:23:02 -0400 From: Michael Ellerman To: Kees Cook Cc: Nicholas Piggin , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "linuxppc-dev\@lists.ozlabs.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/watchdog: Convert timers to use timer_setup() In-Reply-To: References: <20171016234710.GA102273@beast> <20171017125204.728b3a95@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> <87r2u2hs9t.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:22:57 +1100 Message-ID: <87zi8ohcgu.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kees Cook writes: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Nicholas Piggin writes: >> >>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:47:10 -0700 >>> Kees Cook wrote: >>> >>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >>>> >>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt >>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras >>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman >>>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin >>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >>> >>> Looks fine to me. Is this intended to be merged via the powerpc tree >>> in the next merge window? >> >> It relies on the new timer_setup(), which is in one of tglx's trees (I >> think). So I expect it to go via that tree. > > It's in -rc3, but the timer tree can carry it if you want. Which do > you prefer? Oh sorry, I assumed it was in only in linux-next. I'll take this. Thanks. cheers