From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0D8C43215 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAABA20409 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726548AbfKVCxQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:53:16 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:64450 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726270AbfKVCxQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:53:16 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2019 18:53:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,228,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="358006930" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2019 18:53:15 -0800 Received: from [10.226.38.71] (unknown [10.226.38.71]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332DA5802E4; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:53:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: intel: Add for new SoC From: "Tanwar, Rahul" To: Linus Walleij Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Rob Herring , Andriy Shevchenko , qi-ming.wu@intel.com, yixin.zhu@linux.intel.com, cheol.yong.kim@intel.com References: Message-ID: <8804e672-423e-a754-a68e-4b4a0d2d0881@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:53:12 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/11/2019 10:24 AM, Tanwar, Rahul wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On 21/11/2019 9:53 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:25 AM Rahul Tanwar >> wrote: >> >>> Add dt bindings document for pinmux & GPIO controller driver of >>> Intel Lightning Mountain SoC. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar >> Patch applied, you worked hard to get these bindings done in the >> right YAML format and all. >> >> I have some generic bindings from Rob merged simultaneously >> so it'd be great if you could investigate whether it is possible >> to follow up with a patch to switch over from some of the local >> grammar and toward including pinmux-node.yaml and >> pincfg-node.yaml into these bindings. >> >> The method for inclusion of external generic files can be seen >> in e.g. the display panel bindings, like how >> panel-common.yaml is included into other bindings under >> display/panel/*.yaml. >> >> Tell us if you have any problems with this! > Thanks. Yes, i have gone through Rob's generic pinctrl bindings patch > series and i was double minded if *i should still proceed with this > patch or wait for generic bindings patch to get merged. > > I will take it up to revise this patch to include external generic > files from Rob as soon as kernel 5.5 is released. *Fix typo above. > Regards, > Rahul