From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>, Sam Wu <wusamuel@google.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Isaac J . Manjarres" <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy"
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:43:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <880b7332-562c-4934-4e92-493b112568c9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx_aAynvykDSL4aue3zf5Pv7+hELUHQ=MWOzBbyZBPySDA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/15/22 22:35, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:57 AM Sam Wu <wusamuel@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> This reverts commit 6d5afdc97ea71958287364a1f1d07e59ef151b11.
>>
>> On a Pixel 6 device, it is observed that this commit increases
>> latency by approximately 50ms, or 20%, in migrating a task
>> that requires full CPU utilization from a LITTLE CPU to Fmax
>> on a big CPU. Reverting this change restores the latency back
>> to its original baseline value.
>>
>> Fixes: 6d5afdc97ea7 ("cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy")
>> Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
>> Cc: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sam Wu <wusamuel@google.com>
>
> Rafael, can we pick this up please?
>
> Lukasz, no objections to the idea itself, but it's causing regression
> and we'd like to revert and then fix it.
If you see this in mainline kernel, then I'm fine with reverting it.
Then I will have to trace why this CPU capacity value can change over
time in mainline kernel (while it shouldn't, because we register the
cpufreq policy and the governor later, after we calculate the capacity
in arch_topology.c). Maybe something has changed in mainline in the
meantime in this CPU capacity setup code, which caused this side effect.
I know that android-mainline has some different setup code for those
custom vendor governors. I just want to eliminate this bit and be on the
same page.
Regards,
Lukasz
>
> -Saravana
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-10 19:57 Sam Wu
2022-11-15 22:35 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-11-16 11:43 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2022-11-16 12:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-18 1:00 ` Sam Wu
2022-11-21 19:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-22 8:58 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-30 10:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-30 14:04 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-30 14:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-30 15:00 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-16 11:35 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-20 18:07 ` [PATCH v1] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy" #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-11-27 12:06 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-05 9:18 ` [PATCH v1] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy" Viresh Kumar
2022-12-06 8:17 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=880b7332-562c-4934-4e92-493b112568c9@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wusamuel@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®