From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA4BC3A5A6 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6311208C0 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2403885AbfISOYH (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:24:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13527 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387693AbfISOYF (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:24:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D0C18C4275; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-125-72.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.125.72]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41FB60C18; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20190919131537.GA15392@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20190919131537.GA15392@bombadil.infradead.org> <28368.1568875207@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <16147.1568632167@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <16257.1568886562@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds , YueHaibing , Marc Dionne , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL afs: Development for 5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8820.1568903040.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:24:00 +0100 Message-ID: <8821.1568903040@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.62]); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Why is it organised this way? I mean, yes, technically, rxrpc is a > generic layer-6 protocol that any blah blah blah, but in practice no > other user has come up in the last 37 years, so why bother pretending > one is going to? Just git mv net/rxrpc fs/afs/ and merge everything > through your tree. Note that, unlike 9p, sunrpc and ceph, rxrpc is exposed as a network protocol and can be used directly with socket(AF_RXRPC, ...). I have part of a userspace tool suite that uses this. David