From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07DEF7083C; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 05:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.246 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749534680; cv=none; b=FUWWRjE8fIYCdNfNLsisqshrQfjEGNxILJpAqhofKJm4x5XlzewDoXd6eVTd4tFj6fx+yk3IqcaLnCzleqX332/5Yn40LidRfXSO0Ogkv6jTikudMttnczC48WJiWMXlrLuI0eCiYMQDodOsucpecdsxemYMkOzMYuM6B84iqo8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749534680; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e4OTsFMMlmb+XEBaO8FUXxhnEip/H2bZYifJGe0n3+o=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Z1HCeHu8SY4XC+/hqy83fGGfRR1PEd+bBPOMg2QwMs0ZXZT5TqTL6g6kiZ+buWL79AGG9Du8VfbRGX7oXXyl41OYm1HU/pptjaaGtMzXgSJMFBmwXBbNFieNtbd6Bz5aho/Az5ikAA9yM/bneUXMi2EI4XmMxc/LrbQ6MCxix+0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=uF0srVgC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.246 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="uF0srVgC" Received: from lelvem-sh02.itg.ti.com ([10.180.78.226]) by fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 55A5p5PG990140; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:51:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1749534665; bh=ubVv6Vi59J/Kq5R4zgkakD6l3jcATZeCXAQgr62ypkg=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=uF0srVgCv6ggp9b0C3x1VOobnO00RD68u0yRg5Abo668OpX5uvAfJ8veVlz4g6JEe kNBzZjvmzL8uobW7nAjH047J54JyXWC42gDRlkRgKEFBKFb2btsOQxOwEgl/NjS0ow Axtd3/gx00w8KS1NcyPv41eqDSy0J/0KWDssv/3s= Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (dlee110.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.21]) by lelvem-sh02.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 55A5p5551902086 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:51:05 -0500 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:51:05 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr06.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.8) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:51:05 -0500 Received: from localhost ([172.24.227.169]) by lelvem-mr06.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 55A5p4ic2424215; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:51:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:21:03 +0530 From: Siddharth Vadapalli To: Hrushikesh Salunke CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep: Add boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" Message-ID: <88554900-b280-425f-b79d-d065b10290a5@ti.com> References: <20250610054920.2395509-1-h-salunke@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250610054920.2395509-1-h-salunke@ti.com> X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 11:19:20AM +0530, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: > AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot > on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be > functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the > "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. > > Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke Reviewed-by: Siddharth Vadapalli Regards, Siddharth.