From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/irqdomain: Clean code for __irq_domain_create()
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:22:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <887d424c-c6b5-e5c7-21d3-9b920272fbc3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pltyrf9l.ffs@tglx>
On 2024/5/7 2:01, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30 2024 at 17:33, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Introduce irq_domain_alloc_name() function to handle name allocation for
>> the irq domain, add "out_free_domain" label to free the irq domain, and
>> when "is_fwnode_irqchip(fwnode)" is true, "domain->fwnode = fwnode" is
>> the common action, so do it outside the switch, which can make the code
>> more clearer.
>
> First of all changelogs should describe the reason for the change and
> not enumerate a list of things which the patch does. The latter can be
> seen from the patch itself.
Thanks for the good advice,subsequent patches will learn from the
experience.
>
>> +static int irq_domain_alloc_name(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>> + struct irq_domain *domain,
>> + int unknown_domains, char *in_name)
>> +{
>> + char *name;
>> +
>> + if (fwnode == NULL) {
>> + if (unknown_domains)
>> + domain->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "unknown-%d",
>> + unknown_domains);
>> + else
>> + domain->name = kstrdup(in_name, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!domain->name)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * fwnode paths contain '/', which debugfs is legitimately
>> + * unhappy about. Replace them with ':', which does
>> + * the trick and is not as offensive as '\'...
>> + */
>> + name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pfw", fwnode);
>> + if (!name)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + domain->name = strreplace(name, '/', ':');
>> +
>> +out:
>> + domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
>> + return 0;
>
> This function is horrible. The only shared thing here is the
> domain->flags manipulation. I'm not seeing how this is an improvement.
Yes, the IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED flag is shared, the purpose of this
change is to make the code that allocates the domain name in the
__irq_domain_create() function look like it doesn't take up too much
space, so it looks cleaner.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 9:33 Jinjie Ruan
2024-05-06 18:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-07 1:22 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2024-05-07 10:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=887d424c-c6b5-e5c7-21d3-9b920272fbc3@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®