mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/irqdomain: Clean code for __irq_domain_create()
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:22:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <887d424c-c6b5-e5c7-21d3-9b920272fbc3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pltyrf9l.ffs@tglx>



On 2024/5/7 2:01, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30 2024 at 17:33, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Introduce irq_domain_alloc_name() function to handle name allocation for
>> the irq domain, add "out_free_domain" label to free the irq domain, and
>> when "is_fwnode_irqchip(fwnode)" is true, "domain->fwnode = fwnode" is
>> the common action, so do it outside the switch, which can make the code
>> more clearer.
> 
> First of all changelogs should describe the reason for the change and
> not enumerate a list of things which the patch does. The latter can be
> seen from the patch itself.

Thanks for the good advice,subsequent patches will learn from the
experience.

> 
>> +static int irq_domain_alloc_name(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>> +				 struct irq_domain *domain,
>> +				 int unknown_domains, char *in_name)
>> +{
>> +	char *name;
>> +
>> +	if (fwnode == NULL) {
>> +		if (unknown_domains)
>> +			domain->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "unknown-%d",
>> +						 unknown_domains);
>> +		else
>> +			domain->name = kstrdup(in_name, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!domain->name)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * fwnode paths contain '/', which debugfs is legitimately
>> +	 * unhappy about. Replace them with ':', which does
>> +	 * the trick and is not as offensive as '\'...
>> +	 */
>> +	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pfw", fwnode);
>> +	if (!name)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	domain->name = strreplace(name, '/', ':');
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
>> +	return 0;
> 
> This function is horrible. The only shared thing here is the
> domain->flags manipulation. I'm not seeing how this is an improvement.

Yes, the IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED flag is shared, the purpose of this
change is to make the code that allocates the domain name in the
__irq_domain_create() function look like it doesn't take up too much
space, so it looks cleaner.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-30  9:33 Jinjie Ruan
2024-05-06 18:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-07  1:22   ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2024-05-07 10:22     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=887d424c-c6b5-e5c7-21d3-9b920272fbc3@huawei.com \
    --to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®