mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq, intel_pstate, Fix intel_pstate powersave min_perf_pct value
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:32:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8881818.1ik7dTLnEz@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561EECF9.4070500@redhat.com>

On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 08:02:02 PM Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> 
> On 10/14/2015 08:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 07:59:38 PM Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/14/2015 05:09 PM, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:41:59 -0400
> >>> Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On systems that initialize the intel_pstate driver with the performance
> >>>> governor, and then switch to the powersave governor will not transition to
> >>>> lower cpu frequencies until /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
> >>>> is set to a low value.
> >>>>
> >>>> The behavior of governor switching changed after commit a04759924e25
> >>>> ("[cpufreq] intel_pstate: honor user space min_perf_pct override on
> >>>>  resume").  The commit introduced tracking of performance percentage
> >>>> changes via sysfs in order to restore userspace changes during
> >>>> suspend/resume.  The problem occurs because the global values of the newly
> >>>> introduced max_sysfs_pct and min_sysfs_pct are not lowered on the governor
> >>>> change and this causes the powersave governor to inherit the performance
> >>>> governor's settings.
> >>>>
> >>>> A simple change would have been to reset max_sysfs_pct to 100 and
> >>>> min_sysfs_pct to 0 on a governor change, which fixes the problem with
> >>>> governor switching.  However, since we cannot break userspace[1] the fix
> >>>> is now to give each governor its own limits storage area so that governor
> >>>> specific changes are tracked.
> >>>>
> >>>> I successfully tested this by booting with both the performance governor
> >>>> and the powersave governor by default, and switching between the two
> >>>> governors (while monitoring /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/ values,
> >>>> and looking at the output of cpupower frequency-info).  Suspend/Resume
> >>>> testing was performed by Doug Smythies.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] Systems which suspend/resume using the unmaintained pm-utils package
> >>>> will always transition to the performance governor before the suspend and
> >>>> after the resume.  This means a system using the powersave governor will
> >>>> go from powersave to performance, then suspend/resume, performance to
> >>>> powersave.  The simple change during governor changes would have been
> >>>> overwritten when the governor changed before and after the suspend/resume.
> >>>> I have submitted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271225
> >>>> against Fedora to remove the 94cpufreq file that causes the problem.  It
> >>>> should be noted that pm-utils is obsoleted with newer versions of systemd.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
> >>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> >>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> >>>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> >>>> Cc: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> BTW - I think I can see an issue here with HWP enabled systems.  It
> >>> looks to me like the hwp settings will not be programmed correctly
> >>> during a governor switch.  This probably needs to be addressed in a
> >>> separate patch.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Oh, I see it now too.  I'll get to that in another patch.  Thanks for pointing
> >> that out Kristen.
> > 
> > The $subject patch doesn't apply any more after the series from Srinivas that
> > I've just applied.
> > 
> > Can you please rebase it on top of my bleeding-edge branch?
> > 
> 
> Sure -- can you send me a pointer to the branch?

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git bleeding-edge

Thanks,
Rafael


      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14 11:41 Prarit Bhargava
2015-10-14 21:09 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2015-10-14 23:59   ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-10-15  0:29     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-15  0:02       ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-10-15  0:32         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8881818.1ik7dTLnEz@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®