mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: ad7124: fix sample rate for multi-channel use
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 16:36:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88936759-77f5-479c-8cdb-121fc08f068f@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLnYk6RPePeACmex@smile.fi.intel.com>

On 9/4/25 1:21 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:19:56AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> Change how the FS[10:0] field of the FILTER register is calculated to
>> get consistent sample rates when only one channel is enabled vs when
>> multiple channels are enabled in a buffered read.
>>
>> By default, the AD7124 allows larger sampling frequencies when only one
>> channel is enabled. It assumes that you will discard the first sample or
>> so to allow for settling time and then no additional settling time is
>> needed between samples because there is no multiplexing due to only one
>> channel being enabled. The conversion formula to convert between the
>> sampling frequency and the FS[10:0] field is:
>>
>>     fADC = fCLK / (FS[10:0] x 32)
>>
>> which is what the driver has been using.
>>
>> On the other hand, when multiple channels are enabled, there is
>> additional settling time needed when switching between channels so the
>> calculation to convert between becomes:
>>
>>     fADC = fCLK / (FS[10:0] x 32 x (4 + AVG - 1))
>>
>> where AVG depends on the filter type selected and the power mode.
>>
>> The FILTER register has a SINGLE_CYCLE bit that can be set to force the
>> single channel case to use the same timing as the multi-channel case.
>>
>> Before this change, the first formula was always used, so if all of the
>> in_voltageY_sampling_frequency attributes were set to 10 Hz, then doing
>> a buffered read with 1 channel enabled would result in the requested
>> sampling frequency of 10 Hz. But when more than one channel was
>> enabled, the actual sampling frequency would be 2.5 Hz per channel,
>> which is 1/4 of the requested frequency.
>>
>> After this change, the SINGLE_CYCLE flag is now always enabled and the
>> multi-channel formula is now always used. This causes the sampling
>> frequency to be consistent regardless of the number of channels enabled.
>>
>> Technically, the sincx+sinc1 filter modes can't currently be selected
>> so there is some temporarily dead code in ad7124_get_avg() until filter
>> support is added.
>>
>> The AD7124_FILTER_FS define is moved while we are touching this to
>> keep the bit fields in descending order to be consistent with the rest
>> of the file.
> 
> ...
> 
>>  	tmp = FIELD_PREP(AD7124_FILTER_FILTER, cfg->filter_type) |
>> +		AD7124_FILTER_SINGLE_CYCLE |
>>  		FIELD_PREP(AD7124_FILTER_FS, cfg->odr_sel_bits);
> 
> Seems to me that this is not indented correctly, with that in mind I would
> 
> 	tmp = FIELD_PREP(AD7124_FILTER_FILTER, cfg->filter_type) |
> 	      FIELD_PREP(AD7124_FILTER_FS, cfg->odr_sel_bits) |
> 	      AD7124_FILTER_SINGLE_CYCLE;
> 
> 

All 3 of these lines are being removed in a later patch (haven't sent it to the
mailing list yet). So I will leave this as-is to keep the diff to a minimum.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-04 16:19 David Lechner
2025-09-04 18:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-04 21:36   ` David Lechner [this message]
2025-09-04 19:53 ` David Lechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=88936759-77f5-479c-8cdb-121fc08f068f@baylibre.com \
    --to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®