From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
Andrey Wagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix root cause for missed hardware breakpoints
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 04:14:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88D39E57-59DC-4DC6-9C14-2C69D10DF9C8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D03E92.6080607@linux.intel.com>
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/26/2016 07:46 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Commit 172b2386ed16 ("KVM: x86: fix missed hardware breakpoints",
>> 2016-02-10) worked around a case where the debug registers are not loaded
>> correctly on preemption and on the first entry to KVM_RUN.
>>
>> However, Xiao Guangrong pointed out that the root cause must be that
>> KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED is not being set correctly. This can indeed
>> happen due to the lazy debug exit mechanism, which does not call
>> kvm_update_dr7. Fix it by replacing the existing loop (more or less
>> equivalent to kvm_update_dr0123) with calls to all the kvm_update_dr*
>> functions.
>>
>> The original patch is good enough for stable releases before 4.1, since
>> it does not have any dependencies such as commit ae561edeb421 ("KVM:
>> x86: DR0-DR3 are not clear on reset", 2015-04-02).
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1+
>> Fixes: 172b2386ed16a9143d9a456aae5ec87275c61489
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index f4891f2ece23..eaf6ee8c28b8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -2752,7 +2752,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
>> }
>>
>> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE, vcpu);
>> - vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs |= KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD;
>> }
>>
>> void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> @@ -6619,12 +6618,12 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> * KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT again.
>> */
>> if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs & KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT)) {
>> - int i;
>> -
>> WARN_ON(vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP);
>> kvm_x86_ops->sync_dirty_debug_regs(vcpu);
>> - for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_DB_REGS; i++)
>> - vcpu->arch.eff_db[i] = vcpu->arch.db[i];
>> + kvm_update_dr0123(vcpu);
>> + kvm_update_dr6(vcpu);
>> + kvm_update_dr7(vcpu);
>> + vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs &= ~KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD;
>> }
>
> It is good to me now. It also can fix the case that the debug registers are
> changed by the debug-process(gdb/perf) in the context of the vcpu as i
> described in another thread.
Seems correct. The code may be easier to follow if the following line:
vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs &= ~KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT
would have been moved out of svm_sync_dirty_debug_regs and
vmx_sync_dirty_debug_regs into the flow of vcpu_enter_guest (above).
Nadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-26 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-26 11:46 Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-26 12:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-26 12:14 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2016-02-26 12:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88D39E57-59DC-4DC6-9C14-2C69D10DF9C8@gmail.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®