From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 10:22:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 10:22:46 -0400 Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]:53007 "EHLO mailout06.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 10:22:36 -0400 Date: 08 Sep 2001 15:25:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de cc: wietse@porcupine.org Message-ID: <88VMTxi1w-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <20010907131357.D13826@emma1.emma.line.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19 X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh7 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: <9na3o5$c9$1@forge.intermeta.de> <20010906232033.L13547@emma1.emma.line.org> <9na3o5$c9$1@forge.intermeta.de> <20010907131357.D13826@emma1.emma.line.org> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de (Matthias Andree) wrote on 07.09.01 in <20010907131357.D13826@emma1.emma.line.org>: > If people only commented (not flamed) constructively on my patch rather > than adding fuel to this unnecessary fire. I suspect people would be more likely to do that if they weren't told, over and over again, "Stop this BSD vs. Linux bullshit. Just do it the BSD way. Stop your superiority complex. My way is obviously superior." Doh! That's even sillier than djb's rants. And that's saying a lot. MfG Kai