From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
vinod.koul@intel.com, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ASoC: Intel: Kconfig+acpi fixes
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:52:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88a3511c-b3c5-9a92-8d31-33bc1619427b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1514999340.7000.597.camel@linux.intel.com>
On 01/03/2018 11:09 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 10:50 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> The first patch solves issues reported by 0day with non-ACPI platforms
>>
>> The second patch implements what Linus, Takashi and Mark
>> requested: a top-level selector defaulting to 'y' to easily filter all
>> other options and with no impact on code generation. There should be
>> no
>> functionality change and will avoid breaking audio for people using
>> make oldnoconfig.
>>
>> The rest of the patch series does a more in-depth cleanup. It was
>> tested
>> on Baytrail/Cherrytrail/Skylake platforms with no regressions
>> observed and no reports of any compilation issues with 0-day or
>> randconfig.
>>
>> The 5th patch is really the most important one, there were nested
>> configs which made no sense to me. I don't know the history which led
>> to such complicated stuff but simpler is better.
>>
>> Patches 6..7 are just clean-ups of the machine driver configs,
>> for some reason there is no consistency in the settings so I tried to
>> apply common sense and use the same rules. At Andy Shevchenko's
>> suggestion,
>> I also replaced the broken dependency on X86_INTEL_LPSS by
>> MFD_INTEL_LPSS
>> for Skylake+ machines. No regressions were identified with this
>> change.
>>
>> Patch 9 is new in this series and are just cosmetic changes (comments
>> and text simplification).
>>
>> Thanks to Vinod Koul for his contributions and comments.
> Couple of nitpicks and seems patch 9 missed some (all?) comments to be
> addressed.
>
> So, after fixing them:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Thanks Andy for the quick review. the last patch is new and indeed could
be cleaned-up further, will send a v3.
>
>> Changes since v1:
>> fixed more 0-day warnings for e.g. s390 non-ACPI compilation
>> fixed use of depends
>> fixed use of CONFIG_
>> fixed indentations as needed
>> simplified text and comments
>>
>> Changes since RFCv2:
>> Moved machine drivers to submenu
>> Dropped SND_SOC_INTEL_COMMON since it was not needed
>> Added more comments for if/endif
>> Simplified text for options (dropped "ASoC Intel driver....")
>> Fixed one 0-day warning
>>
>> Changes since initial RFC:
>> Removed default n
>> Added help text for HASWELL, BAYTRAIL (legacy) and SKYLAKE options
>> Made top level machine driver selection dependent on
>> INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL.
>> Added help text for PCI and HIFI2 platforms
>> Replaced X86_INTEL_LPSS by MFD_INTEL_LPSS for Skylake+ devices
>> Fixed a couple of indentation issues
>>
>> Pierre-Louis Bossart (8):
>> ASoC: acpi: add missing includes for non-ACPI platforms
>> ASoC: Intel: Fix Kconfig with top-level selector
>> ASoC: Intel: Kconfig: Simplify-clarify ACPI/PCI dependencies
>> ASoC: Intel: document what Kconfig options do
>> ASoC: Intel: Fix nested/unnecessary Kconfig dependencies
>> ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig dependencies for
>> Haswell/Broadwell
>> ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig configurations for HiFi2
>> ASoC: Intel: boards: align/fix SKL/BXT/KBL Kconfigs
>>
>> Vinod Koul (1):
>> ASoC: Intel: kconfig: add some comments for if symbols
>>
>> include/sound/soc-acpi-intel-match.h | 1 +
>> include/sound/soc-acpi.h | 1 +
>> sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 116 +++++++++++++++------
>> sound/soc/intel/Makefile | 2 +-
>> sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig | 191 ++++++++++++++++++------
>> -----------
>> 5 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-03 16:50 Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ASoC: acpi: add missing includes for non-ACPI platforms Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-08 16:23 ` Applied "ASoC: acpi: add missing includes for non-ACPI platforms" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] ASoC: Intel: Fix Kconfig with top-level selector Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-08 16:22 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: Fix Kconfig with top-level selector" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ASoC: Intel: Kconfig: Simplify-clarify ACPI/PCI dependencies Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-08 16:22 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: Kconfig: Simplify-clarify ACPI/PCI dependencies" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] ASoC: Intel: document what Kconfig options do Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-08 16:22 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: document what Kconfig options do" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] ASoC: Intel: Fix nested/unnecessary Kconfig dependencies Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-03 16:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-01-03 18:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig dependencies for Haswell/Broadwell Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig configurations for HiFi2 Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-08 16:21 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig configurations for HiFi2" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ASoC: Intel: boards: align/fix SKL/BXT/KBL Kconfigs Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-03 17:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-01-03 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ASoC: Intel: kconfig: add some comments for if symbols Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-03 17:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-01-03 19:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-01-03 19:51 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2018-01-03 17:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] ASoC: Intel: Kconfig+acpi fixes Andy Shevchenko
2018-01-03 18:52 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2018-01-03 19:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88a3511c-b3c5-9a92-8d31-33bc1619427b@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®