Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL in napi_gro_receive()

[Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@dlink.ru>]

Hi Ilias,

Ilias Apalodimas wrote 11.10.2019 15:23:
> Hi Alexander,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:42:24PM +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>> 
>> This series was written as a continuation to commit 323ebb61e32b
>> ("net: use listified RX for handling GRO_NORMAL skbs"), and also takes
>> an advantage of listified Rx for GRO. This time, however, we're
>> targeting at a way more common and used function, napi_gro_receive().
>> 
>> There are about ~100 call sites of this function, including gro_cells
>> and mac80211, so even wireless systems will benefit from it.
>> The only driver that cares about the return value is
>> ethernet/socionext/netsec, and only for updating statistics. I don't
>> believe that this change can break its functionality, but anyway,
>> we have plenty of time till next merge window to pay this change
>> a proper attention.
> 
> I don't think this will break anything on the netsec driver. Dropped 
> packets
> will still be properly accounted for
> 

Thank you for clarification. Do I need to mention you under separate 
Acked-by in v2?

>> 
>> Besides having this functionality implemented for napi_gro_frags()
>> users, the main reason is the solid performance boost that has been
>> shown during tests on 1-core MIPS board (with not yet mainlined
>> driver):
>> 
>> * no batching (5.4-rc2): ~450/450 Mbit/s
>> * with gro_normal_batch == 8: ~480/480 Mbit/s
>> * with gro_normal_batch == 16: ~500/500 Mbit/s
>> 
>> Applies on top of net-next.
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Alexander Lobakin (2):
>>   net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL in napi_gro_receive()
>>   net: core: increase the default size of GRO_NORMAL skb lists to 
>> flush
>> 
>>  net/core/dev.c | 51 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>> 
>> --
>> 2.23.0
>> 
> 
> Thanks
> /Ilias

Regards,
ᚷ ᛖ ᚢ ᚦ ᚠ ᚱ