From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: nVMX: Don't use Enlightened MSR Bitmap for L3
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 17:38:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8942e8892b1567354c7e3f3269c0c7baefb9d8c2.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYSAPotqLVIScunK@google.com>
On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 00:52 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > 3-level nesting is also not a very common setup nowadays.
>
> Says who? :-D
I regularly test 4 level nesting :P
It's KVM all the way down....
But jokes aside 3 level nesting will start to happen occasionally more and more often,
IMHO with windows guests which have accidently/or on purpose enabled HypoerV/Core isolation/WSL3 inside,
and that are run nested on KVM.
Just FYI. I have a patch series pending (reviews are welcome!) which implement nested vVMLOAD/vVMSAVE and
vGIF which allows L1 to use these optional SVM features to run its nested guests (that is L3s) faster.
(This series is the reason I was recently stress testing 3/4 level nesting.
4 levels usually work so slow that VM doesn't boot and timeouts in various systemd settings).
3rd level works not that bad IMHO.
All that said I don't have any objections to the patch itself.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> > Don't enable 'Enlightened MSR Bitmap' feature for KVM's L2s (real L3s) for
> > now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index 1c8b2b6e7ed9..e82cdde58119 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -2655,15 +2655,6 @@ int alloc_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
> > if (!loaded_vmcs->msr_bitmap)
> > goto out_vmcs;
> > memset(loaded_vmcs->msr_bitmap, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
> > -
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) &&
> > - static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs) &&
> > - (ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_MSR_BITMAP)) {
> > - struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs =
> > - (struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *)loaded_vmcs->vmcs;
> > -
> > - evmcs->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap = 1;
> > - }
> > }
> >
> > memset(&loaded_vmcs->host_state, 0, sizeof(struct vmcs_host_state));
> > @@ -6903,6 +6894,18 @@ static int vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >
> > vmx->loaded_vmcs = &vmx->vmcs01;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Use Hyper-V 'Enlightened MSR Bitmap' feature when KVM runs as a
> > + * nested (L1) hypervisor and Hyper-V in L0 supports it.
>
> And maybe call out specifically that KVM intentionally uses this only for vmcs02?
>
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) && static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs)
> > + && (ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_MSR_BITMAP)) {
>
> && on the previous line, I think we'll survive the 82 char line :-)
>
> > + struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs =
> > + (struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *)vmx->loaded_vmcs->vmcs;
>
> Hmm, what about landing this right after vmcs01's VMCS is allocated? It's kinda
> weird, but it makes it more obvious that ->vmcs is not NULL. And if the cast is
> simply via a "void *" it all fits on one line.
>
> err = alloc_loaded_vmcs(&vmx->vmcs01);
> if (err < 0)
> goto free_pml;
>
> /*
> * Use Hyper-V 'Enlightened MSR Bitmap' feature when KVM runs as a
> * nested (L1) hypervisor and Hyper-V in L0 supports it. Enable an
> * enlightened bitmap only for vmcs01, KVM currently isn't equipped to
> * realize any performance benefits from enabling it for vmcs02.
> */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) && static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs) &&
> (ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_MSR_BITMAP)) {
> struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs = (void *)vmx->vmcs01.vmcs;
>
> evmcs->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap = 1;
> }
>
> > +
> > + evmcs->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap = 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (cpu_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(vcpu)) {
> > err = alloc_apic_access_page(vcpu->kvm);
> > if (err)
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-05 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 14:22 [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Enlightened MSR Bitmap feature for Hyper-V on KVM Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-10-13 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: nVMX: Don't use Enlightened MSR Bitmap for L3 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-05 0:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-05 12:03 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-05 15:38 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-11-05 15:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-13 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: VMX: Introduce vmx_msr_bitmap_l01_changed() helper Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-05 1:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-13 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Track whether changes in L0 require MSR bitmap for L2 to be rebuilt Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-05 1:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-05 12:06 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-05 14:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-13 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: nVMX: Implement Enlightened MSR Bitmap feature Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-05 1:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-05 12:08 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-03 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Enlightened MSR Bitmap feature for Hyper-V on KVM Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8942e8892b1567354c7e3f3269c0c7baefb9d8c2.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®