From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hongren Zheng <i@zenithal.me>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbip: vhci: do not give back URBs with an unchecked actual_length
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 09:00:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89461e8e-68e0-44ad-8e75-57797886198d@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aurLXADfuLjs-dm-@griffin.linux.hr>
On 11/3/26 23:06, Vlatko Kosturjak wrote:
> vhci_recv_ret_submit() copies actual_length from the RET_SUBMIT header
> into the URB before usbip_recv_xbuff() checks it. When the server reports
> more data than the URB's transfer buffer holds, usbip_recv_xbuff() rejects
> the reply and shuts the connection down, but the URB is still given back
> with the oversized actual_length (and status -EPROTO).
>
> Completion handlers trust actual_length. usbfs copies that many bytes from
> the transfer buffer to user space in copy_urb_data_to_user(), whatever the
> URB status, so the kernel reads past the kmalloc()ed buffer. With
> CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY this is a BUG in the context of the process
> reaping the URB:
>
> usb 1-1: recv xbuf, 0
> usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'kmalloc-rnd-05-16' (offset 0, size 22)!
> kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!
> RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0x6c/0x80
> Call Trace:
> copy_urb_data_to_user+0x122/0x160
> processcompl+0xe3/0x160
> usbdev_do_ioctl+0x14d/0x1900
>
> Without it, the adjacent heap contents are copied to user space.
>
> This was hit with a buggy user-space USB/IP device implementation (it
> answered an IN URB with more data than requested) while pcscd read from
> the device; any server, buggy or malicious, can trigger it.
>
> Do not trust actual_length when the transfer buffer could not be
> received: give the URB back with actual_length 0. A short read leaves the
> buffer partly unfilled too, so this covers both failure cases.
>
> Fixes: b348d7dddb6c ("USB: usbip: fix potential out-of-bounds write")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>
> ---
> Tested on host 7.0 (Ubuntu 7.0.0-34-generic) in QEMU with a small reproducer: a
> user-space program that attaches a fake device to vhci_hcd through a Unix
> socketpair (no network or usbip tools needed), answers a 16-byte bulk IN
> URB with actual_length 22, and reaps the URB through usbfs:
>
> unpatched, CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y: the BUG above
> unpatched, hardened_usercopy=off: reaped actual_length 22 for a 16-byte
> buffer; with 200 extra bytes, 200 bytes
> of adjacent heap reach user space
> patched: reaped status -EPROTO, actual_length 0
>
> The vhci_rx.c hunk is the same in v7.0 and in mainline. Happy to send the
> reproducer (about 300 lines of C plus a QEMU script) if useful.
>
> The 2026 hardening of RET_SUBMIT (number_of_packets, iso frame lengths)
> does not cover this path; it is the non-isochronous actual_length.
>
> drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> index a678e7c89..720dafa72 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ static void vhci_recv_ret_submit(struct vhci_device *vdev,
>
> /* recv transfer buffer */
> if (usbip_recv_xbuff(ud, urb) < 0) {
> + /*
> + * The transfer buffer was not filled: either a short read or
> + * an actual_length larger than transfer_buffer_length, which
> + * usbip_recv_xbuff() rejects. Do not give the URB back with
> + * that actual_length: completion handlers trust it, e.g.
> + * usbfs copies actual_length bytes out of transfer_buffer.
> + */
> + urb->actual_length = 0;
> urb->status = -EPROTO;
> goto error;
> }
Greg, please pick this up.
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 6:06 Vlatko Kosturjak
2026-11-11 16:00 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89461e8e-68e0-44ad-8e75-57797886198d@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i@zenithal.me \
--cc=kost@linux.hr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®