From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756786AbaGIS5F (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 14:57:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27499 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752746AbaGIS5C (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 14:57:02 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1404924054.14643.36.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> References: <1404924054.14643.36.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <1403620852-16476-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <24144.1404919879@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Mimi Zohar Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings , linux-security-module , linux-kernel , Josh Boyer , Matthew Garrett , Dmitry Kasatkin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8974.1404932208.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:56:48 +0100 Message-ID: <8975.1404932208@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mimi Zohar wrote: > Yes, that's fine. My concern, however, is that the trusted keyring > patches are independent of the other patches being upstreamed and should > be upstreamed regardless of the other patches. There is overlap in the X.509 certificate request function that you took from my pkcs#7 patches. David