From: Paul M Stillwell Jr <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>
To: Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"Francisco Munoz" <francisco.munoz.ruiz@linux.intel.com>,
"Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"David Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@endlessos.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: vmd: Drop resetting PCI bus action after scan mapped PCI child bus
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:39:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <897ead26-be10-4bb3-b085-1b8c97d93964@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240624082458.00006da1@linux.intel.com>
On 6/24/2024 8:24 AM, Nirmal Patel wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:21:45 +0800
> Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org> wrote:
>
>> According to "PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4", before enabling ASPM L1.2 on the
>> PCIe Root Port and the child device, they should be programmed with
>> the same LTR1.2_Threshold value. However, they have different values
>> on VMD mapped PCI child bus. For example, Asus B1400CEAE's VMD mapped
>> PCI bridge and NVMe SSD controller have different LTR1.2_Threshold
>> values:
>>
>> 10000:e0:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 11th Gen Core Processor
>> PCIe Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) ...
>> Capabilities: [200 v1] L1 PM Substates
>> L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+
>> L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=45us PortTPowerOnTime=50us
>> L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
>> T_CommonMode=45us LTR1.2_Threshold=101376ns
>> L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=50us
>>
>> 10000:e1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Blue
>> SN550 NVMe SSD (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express]) ...
>> Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates
>> L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
>> L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us
>> L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
>> T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
>> L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
>>
>> After debug in detail, both of the VMD mapped PCI bridge and the NVMe
>> SSD controller have been configured properly with the same
>> LTR1.2_Threshold value. But, become misconfigured after reset the VMD
>> mapped PCI bus which is introduced from commit 0a584655ef89 ("PCI:
>> vmd: Fix secondary bus reset for Intel bridges") and commit
>> 6aab5622296b ("PCI: vmd: Clean up domain before enumeration"). So,
>> drop the resetting PCI bus action after scan VMD mapped PCI child bus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
>> ---
>> v6:
>> - Introduced based on the discussion
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/CAPpJ_efYWWxGBopbSQHB=Y2+1RrXFR2XWeqEhGTgdiw3XX0Jmw@mail.gmail.com/
>>
>> drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 20 --------------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c index 5309afbe31f9..af413cdb4f4e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
>> @@ -793,7 +793,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd,
>> unsigned long features) resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
>> resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000;
>> struct pci_bus *child;
>> - struct pci_dev *dev;
>> int ret;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -935,25 +934,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev
>> *vmd, unsigned long features) pci_scan_child_bus(vmd->bus);
>> vmd_domain_reset(vmd);
>>
>> - /* When Intel VMD is enabled, the OS does not discover the
>> Root Ports
>> - * owned by Intel VMD within the MMCFG space.
>> pci_reset_bus() applies
>> - * a reset to the parent of the PCI device supplied as
>> argument. This
>> - * is why we pass a child device, so the reset can be
>> triggered at
>> - * the Intel bridge level and propagated to all the children
>> in the
>> - * hierarchy.
>> - */
>> - list_for_each_entry(child, &vmd->bus->children, node) {
>> - if (!list_empty(&child->devices)) {
>> - dev = list_first_entry(&child->devices,
>> - struct pci_dev,
>> bus_list);
>> - ret = pci_reset_bus(dev);
>> - if (ret)
>> - pci_warn(dev, "can't reset device:
>> %d\n", ret); -
>> - break;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(vmd->bus);
>>
>> pci_walk_bus(vmd->bus, vmd_pm_enable_quirk, &features);
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> pci_reset_bus is required to avoid failure in vmd domain creation
> during multiple soft reboots test. So I believe we can't just remove
> it without proper testing. vmd_pm_enable_quirk happens after
> pci_reset_bus, then how is it resetting LTR1.2_Threshold value?
>
> Thanks
> -nirmal
To follow up on what Nirmal said: why can't you set the threshold value
in vmd_pm_enable_quirk() since we look at LTR there?
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 8:11 [PATCH v6 0/3] PCI: vmd: Enable PCI PM's L1 substates of remapped PCIe Root Port and NVMe Jian-Hong Pan
2024-06-24 8:12 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] PCI: vmd: Set PCI devices to D0 before enable PCI PM's L1 substates Jian-Hong Pan
2024-06-24 8:17 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] PCI/ASPM: Add notes about enabling PCI-PM L1SS to pci_enable_link_state(_locked) Jian-Hong Pan
2024-06-24 8:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: vmd: Drop resetting PCI bus action after scan mapped PCI child bus Jian-Hong Pan
2024-06-24 15:24 ` Nirmal Patel
2024-06-24 15:39 ` Paul M Stillwell Jr [this message]
2024-06-25 10:31 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-06-25 20:32 ` Paul M Stillwell Jr
2024-06-25 9:52 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-06-25 19:42 ` Nirmal Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=897ead26-be10-4bb3-b085-1b8c97d93964@intel.com \
--to=paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=francisco.munoz.ruiz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jhp@endlessos.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@endlessos.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®