mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
To: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
	"Wedson Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@samsung.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
	"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
	"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Carlos Llamas" <cmllamas@google.com>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] rust: file: add `DeferredFdCloser`
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:07:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <899fab69-e051-4d6b-bf6c-452779ed8190@proton.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240118-alice-file-v3-8-9694b6f9580c@google.com>

On 18.01.24 15:36, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> +    /// Schedule a task work that closes the file descriptor when this task returns to userspace.
> +    ///
> +    /// Fails if this is called from a context where we cannot run work when returning to
> +    /// userspace. (E.g., from a kthread.)
> +    pub fn close_fd(self, fd: u32) -> Result<(), DeferredFdCloseError> {
> +        use bindings::task_work_notify_mode_TWA_RESUME as TWA_RESUME;
> +
> +        // In this method, we schedule the task work before closing the file. This is because
> +        // scheduling a task work is fallible, and we need to know whether it will fail before we
> +        // attempt to close the file.
> +
> +        // Task works are not available on kthreads.
> +        let current = crate::current!();
> +        if current.is_kthread() {
> +            return Err(DeferredFdCloseError::TaskWorkUnavailable);
> +        }
> +
> +        // Transfer ownership of the box's allocation to a raw pointer. This disables the
> +        // destructor, so we must manually convert it back to a Box to drop it.
> +        //
> +        // Until we convert it back to a `Box`, there are no aliasing requirements on this
> +        // pointer.
> +        let inner = Box::into_raw(self.inner);
> +
> +        // The `callback_head` field is first in the struct, so this cast correctly gives us a
> +        // pointer to the field.
> +        let callback_head = inner.cast::<bindings::callback_head>();
> +        // SAFETY: This pointer offset operation does not go out-of-bounds.
> +        let file_field = unsafe { core::ptr::addr_of_mut!((*inner).file) };
> +
> +        let current = current.as_raw();
> +
> +        // SAFETY: This function currently has exclusive access to the `DeferredFdCloserInner`, so
> +        // it is okay for us to perform unsynchronized writes to its `callback_head` field.
> +        unsafe { bindings::init_task_work(callback_head, Some(Self::do_close_fd)) };
> +
> +        // SAFETY: This inserts the `DeferredFdCloserInner` into the task workqueue for the current
> +        // task. If this operation is successful, then this transfers exclusive ownership of the
> +        // `callback_head` field to the C side until it calls `do_close_fd`, and we don't touch or
> +        // invalidate the field during that time.
> +        //
> +        // When the C side calls `do_close_fd`, the safety requirements of that method are
> +        // satisfied because when a task work is executed, the callback is given ownership of the
> +        // pointer.
> +        //
> +        // The file pointer is currently null. If it is changed to be non-null before `do_close_fd`
> +        // is called, then that change happens due to the write at the end of this function, and
> +        // that write has a safety comment that explains why the refcount can be dropped when
> +        // `do_close_fd` runs.
> +        let res = unsafe { bindings::task_work_add(current, callback_head, TWA_RESUME) };
> +
> +        if res != 0 {
> +            // SAFETY: Scheduling the task work failed, so we still have ownership of the box, so
> +            // we may destroy it.
> +            unsafe { drop(Box::from_raw(inner)) };
> +
> +            return Err(DeferredFdCloseError::TaskWorkUnavailable);
> +        }
> +
> +        // SAFETY: This is safe no matter what `fd` is. If the `fd` is valid (that is, if the
> +        // pointer is non-null), then we call `filp_close` on the returned pointer as required by
> +        // `close_fd_get_file`.
> +        let file = unsafe { bindings::close_fd_get_file(fd) };
> +        if file.is_null() {
> +            // We don't clean up the task work since that might be expensive if the task work queue
> +            // is long. Just let it execute and let it clean up for itself.
> +            return Err(DeferredFdCloseError::BadFd);
> +        }
> +
> +        // Acquire a refcount to the file.
> +        //
> +        // SAFETY: The `file` pointer points at a file with a non-zero refcount.
> +        unsafe { bindings::get_file(file) };
> +
> +        // SAFETY: The `file` pointer is valid. Passing `current->files` as the file table to close
> +        // it in is correct, since we just got the `fd` from `close_fd_get_file` which also uses
> +        // `current->files`.
> +        //
> +        // This method closes the fd. There could be active light refcounts created from that fd,
> +        // so we must ensure that the file has a positive refcount for the duration of those active
> +        // light refcounts.

This doesn't seem to be part of the SAFETY comment, so maybe move
this comment above it?

> +        //
> +        // Note: fl_owner_t is currently a void pointer.
> +        unsafe { bindings::filp_close(file, (*current).files as bindings::fl_owner_t) };
> +
> +        // We update the file pointer that the task work is supposed to fput. This transfers
> +        // ownership of our last refcount.

I think it is very good that you mention how many refcounts you have
here, but I am missing that in the code above. IIRC `closed_fd_get_file`
acquires a refcount and `filp_close` consumes one.

> +        //
> +        // INVARIANT: This changes the `file` field of a `DeferredFdCloserInner` from null to
> +        // non-null. This doesn't break the type invariant for `DeferredFdCloserInner` because we
> +        // still own a refcount to the file, so we can pass ownership of that refcount to the
> +        // `DeferredFdCloserInner`.
> +        //
> +        // SAFETY: Task works are executed on the current thread right before we return to
> +        // userspace, so this write is guaranteed to happen before `do_close_fd` is called, which
> +        // means that a race is not possible here.
> +        //
> +        // When `do_close_fd` runs, it must be safe for it to `fput` the refcount. However, this is
> +        // the case because all light refcounts that are associated with the fd we closed
> +        // previously must be dropped when `do_close_fd`, since light refcounts must be dropped
> +        // before returning to userspace.

This also doesn't seem to be part of the SAFETY comment.

-- 
Cheers,
Benno

> +        unsafe { *file_field = file };
> +
> +        Ok(())
> +    }
> +
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// The provided pointer must point at the `twork` field of a `DeferredFdCloserInner` stored in
> +    /// a `Box`, and the caller must pass exclusive ownership of that `Box`. Furthermore, if the
> +    /// file pointer is non-null, then it must be okay to release the refcount by calling `fput`.
> +    unsafe extern "C" fn do_close_fd(inner: *mut bindings::callback_head) {
> +        // SAFETY: The caller just passed us ownership of this box.
> +        let inner = unsafe { Box::from_raw(inner.cast::<DeferredFdCloserInner>()) };
> +        if !inner.file.is_null() {
> +            // SAFETY: By the type invariants, we own a refcount to this file, and the caller
> +            // guarantees that dropping the refcount now is okay.
> +            unsafe { bindings::fput(inner.file) };
> +        }
> +        // The allocation is freed when `inner` goes out of scope.
> +    }
> +}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-24 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-18 14:36 [PATCH v3 0/9] File abstractions needed by Rust Binder Alice Ryhl
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] rust: file: add Rust abstraction for `struct file` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-18 22:37   ` Valentin Obst
2024-01-26 15:04   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-29 16:34     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01  9:30       ` Benno Lossin
2024-02-01  9:33         ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01  9:38           ` Benno Lossin
2024-02-01  9:41             ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01  9:48               ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] rust: cred: add Rust abstraction for `struct cred` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19  9:37   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-19  9:52     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-24  9:51       ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] rust: security: add abstraction for secctx Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19  9:41   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] rust: types: add `NotThreadSafe` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19  9:43   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] rust: file: add `FileDescriptorReservation` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19  9:48   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] rust: task: add `Task::current_raw` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19  9:52   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] rust: file: add `Kuid` wrapper Alice Ryhl
2024-01-24  9:55   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] rust: file: add `DeferredFdCloser` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-22 17:59   ` Boqun Feng
2024-01-24 10:07   ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] rust: file: add abstraction for `poll_table` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-24 10:11   ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-29 17:08     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01  9:33       ` Benno Lossin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=899fab69-e051-4d6b-bf6c-452779ed8190@proton.me \
    --to=benno.lossin@proton.me \
    --cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®