From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
To: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Wedson Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@samsung.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Carlos Llamas" <cmllamas@google.com>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] rust: file: add `DeferredFdCloser`
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:07:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <899fab69-e051-4d6b-bf6c-452779ed8190@proton.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240118-alice-file-v3-8-9694b6f9580c@google.com>
On 18.01.24 15:36, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> + /// Schedule a task work that closes the file descriptor when this task returns to userspace.
> + ///
> + /// Fails if this is called from a context where we cannot run work when returning to
> + /// userspace. (E.g., from a kthread.)
> + pub fn close_fd(self, fd: u32) -> Result<(), DeferredFdCloseError> {
> + use bindings::task_work_notify_mode_TWA_RESUME as TWA_RESUME;
> +
> + // In this method, we schedule the task work before closing the file. This is because
> + // scheduling a task work is fallible, and we need to know whether it will fail before we
> + // attempt to close the file.
> +
> + // Task works are not available on kthreads.
> + let current = crate::current!();
> + if current.is_kthread() {
> + return Err(DeferredFdCloseError::TaskWorkUnavailable);
> + }
> +
> + // Transfer ownership of the box's allocation to a raw pointer. This disables the
> + // destructor, so we must manually convert it back to a Box to drop it.
> + //
> + // Until we convert it back to a `Box`, there are no aliasing requirements on this
> + // pointer.
> + let inner = Box::into_raw(self.inner);
> +
> + // The `callback_head` field is first in the struct, so this cast correctly gives us a
> + // pointer to the field.
> + let callback_head = inner.cast::<bindings::callback_head>();
> + // SAFETY: This pointer offset operation does not go out-of-bounds.
> + let file_field = unsafe { core::ptr::addr_of_mut!((*inner).file) };
> +
> + let current = current.as_raw();
> +
> + // SAFETY: This function currently has exclusive access to the `DeferredFdCloserInner`, so
> + // it is okay for us to perform unsynchronized writes to its `callback_head` field.
> + unsafe { bindings::init_task_work(callback_head, Some(Self::do_close_fd)) };
> +
> + // SAFETY: This inserts the `DeferredFdCloserInner` into the task workqueue for the current
> + // task. If this operation is successful, then this transfers exclusive ownership of the
> + // `callback_head` field to the C side until it calls `do_close_fd`, and we don't touch or
> + // invalidate the field during that time.
> + //
> + // When the C side calls `do_close_fd`, the safety requirements of that method are
> + // satisfied because when a task work is executed, the callback is given ownership of the
> + // pointer.
> + //
> + // The file pointer is currently null. If it is changed to be non-null before `do_close_fd`
> + // is called, then that change happens due to the write at the end of this function, and
> + // that write has a safety comment that explains why the refcount can be dropped when
> + // `do_close_fd` runs.
> + let res = unsafe { bindings::task_work_add(current, callback_head, TWA_RESUME) };
> +
> + if res != 0 {
> + // SAFETY: Scheduling the task work failed, so we still have ownership of the box, so
> + // we may destroy it.
> + unsafe { drop(Box::from_raw(inner)) };
> +
> + return Err(DeferredFdCloseError::TaskWorkUnavailable);
> + }
> +
> + // SAFETY: This is safe no matter what `fd` is. If the `fd` is valid (that is, if the
> + // pointer is non-null), then we call `filp_close` on the returned pointer as required by
> + // `close_fd_get_file`.
> + let file = unsafe { bindings::close_fd_get_file(fd) };
> + if file.is_null() {
> + // We don't clean up the task work since that might be expensive if the task work queue
> + // is long. Just let it execute and let it clean up for itself.
> + return Err(DeferredFdCloseError::BadFd);
> + }
> +
> + // Acquire a refcount to the file.
> + //
> + // SAFETY: The `file` pointer points at a file with a non-zero refcount.
> + unsafe { bindings::get_file(file) };
> +
> + // SAFETY: The `file` pointer is valid. Passing `current->files` as the file table to close
> + // it in is correct, since we just got the `fd` from `close_fd_get_file` which also uses
> + // `current->files`.
> + //
> + // This method closes the fd. There could be active light refcounts created from that fd,
> + // so we must ensure that the file has a positive refcount for the duration of those active
> + // light refcounts.
This doesn't seem to be part of the SAFETY comment, so maybe move
this comment above it?
> + //
> + // Note: fl_owner_t is currently a void pointer.
> + unsafe { bindings::filp_close(file, (*current).files as bindings::fl_owner_t) };
> +
> + // We update the file pointer that the task work is supposed to fput. This transfers
> + // ownership of our last refcount.
I think it is very good that you mention how many refcounts you have
here, but I am missing that in the code above. IIRC `closed_fd_get_file`
acquires a refcount and `filp_close` consumes one.
> + //
> + // INVARIANT: This changes the `file` field of a `DeferredFdCloserInner` from null to
> + // non-null. This doesn't break the type invariant for `DeferredFdCloserInner` because we
> + // still own a refcount to the file, so we can pass ownership of that refcount to the
> + // `DeferredFdCloserInner`.
> + //
> + // SAFETY: Task works are executed on the current thread right before we return to
> + // userspace, so this write is guaranteed to happen before `do_close_fd` is called, which
> + // means that a race is not possible here.
> + //
> + // When `do_close_fd` runs, it must be safe for it to `fput` the refcount. However, this is
> + // the case because all light refcounts that are associated with the fd we closed
> + // previously must be dropped when `do_close_fd`, since light refcounts must be dropped
> + // before returning to userspace.
This also doesn't seem to be part of the SAFETY comment.
--
Cheers,
Benno
> + unsafe { *file_field = file };
> +
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +
> + /// # Safety
> + ///
> + /// The provided pointer must point at the `twork` field of a `DeferredFdCloserInner` stored in
> + /// a `Box`, and the caller must pass exclusive ownership of that `Box`. Furthermore, if the
> + /// file pointer is non-null, then it must be okay to release the refcount by calling `fput`.
> + unsafe extern "C" fn do_close_fd(inner: *mut bindings::callback_head) {
> + // SAFETY: The caller just passed us ownership of this box.
> + let inner = unsafe { Box::from_raw(inner.cast::<DeferredFdCloserInner>()) };
> + if !inner.file.is_null() {
> + // SAFETY: By the type invariants, we own a refcount to this file, and the caller
> + // guarantees that dropping the refcount now is okay.
> + unsafe { bindings::fput(inner.file) };
> + }
> + // The allocation is freed when `inner` goes out of scope.
> + }
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 14:36 [PATCH v3 0/9] File abstractions needed by Rust Binder Alice Ryhl
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] rust: file: add Rust abstraction for `struct file` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-18 22:37 ` Valentin Obst
2024-01-26 15:04 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-29 16:34 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01 9:30 ` Benno Lossin
2024-02-01 9:33 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01 9:38 ` Benno Lossin
2024-02-01 9:41 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01 9:48 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] rust: cred: add Rust abstraction for `struct cred` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19 9:37 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-19 9:52 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-24 9:51 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] rust: security: add abstraction for secctx Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19 9:41 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] rust: types: add `NotThreadSafe` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19 9:43 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] rust: file: add `FileDescriptorReservation` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19 9:48 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] rust: task: add `Task::current_raw` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-19 9:52 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] rust: file: add `Kuid` wrapper Alice Ryhl
2024-01-24 9:55 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] rust: file: add `DeferredFdCloser` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-22 17:59 ` Boqun Feng
2024-01-24 10:07 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2024-01-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] rust: file: add abstraction for `poll_table` Alice Ryhl
2024-01-24 10:11 ` Benno Lossin
2024-01-29 17:08 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-01 9:33 ` Benno Lossin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=899fab69-e051-4d6b-bf6c-452779ed8190@proton.me \
--to=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®