mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Garg, Shivank" <shivankg@amd.com>
To: "rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"byungchul@sk.com" <byungchul@sk.com>,
	"rakie.kim@sk.com" <rakie.kim@sk.com>,
	"vbabka@kernel.org" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	"harry@kernel.org" <harry@kernel.org>,
	"ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"riel@surriel.com" <riel@surriel.com>,
	"david@kernel.org" <david@kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"matthew.brost@intel.com" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"surenb@google.com" <surenb@google.com>,
	"gourry@gourry.net" <gourry@gourry.net>,
	"ziy@nvidia.com" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	"jannh@google.com" <jannh@google.com>,
	"liam@infradead.org" <liam@infradead.org>,
	"mhocko@suse.com" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"ljs@kernel.org" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"lance.yang@linux.dev" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	"joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com" <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	"apopple@nvidia.com" <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Rao, Bharata Bhasker" <bharata@amd.com>,
	"kinseyho@google.com" <kinseyho@google.com>,
	"dev.jain@arm.com" <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com" <kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com>,
	"fvdl@google.com" <fvdl@google.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"weixugc@google.com" <weixugc@google.com>,
	"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: factor out generic PTE batch detection from swap_pte_batch()
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:48:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89d8c2d6f35f7fdc3444ea3a62ccd244945d9644.camel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dddb3bb15dd9179388cef41a6564dbe722f9b1e.camel@amd.com>

On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 13:30 +0530, Shivank Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-08-13 at 11:57 +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> > On 8/13/26 06:23, Shivank Garg wrote:
> > > Factor out the generic PTE batch detection logic from swap_pte_batch()
> > > into softleaf_pte_batch() helper, so that it can be reused by upcoming
> > > patch that adds restore-side batching of migration entries.
> > > 
> > > swap_pte_batch() now keeps only its swap-specific concerns and
> > > delegates the batch detection to softleaf_pte_batch().
> > > 
> > > No functional changes intended.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
> > > ---
> > >  mm/internal.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> > > index a5d0488a54dc..1e1ab53b642e 100644
> > > --- a/mm/internal.h
> > > +++ b/mm/internal.h
> > > @@ -560,6 +560,26 @@ static inline void set_softleaf_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static inline int softleaf_pte_batch(pte_t *start_ptep, int max_nr, pte_t pte)
> > > +{
> > > +	pte_t expected_pte = pte_next_softleaf_offset(pte);
> > > +	const pte_t *end_ptep = start_ptep + max_nr;
> > > +	pte_t *ptep = start_ptep + 1;
> > > +
> > 
> > Wouldn't we want some way to make sure that the softleaf entries actually carry
> > offsets or pfns of sorts?
> > 
> > > +	VM_WARN_ON(max_nr < 1);
> > > +
> > > +	while (ptep < end_ptep) {
> > > +		pte = ptep_get(ptep);
> > > +
> > > +		if (!pte_same(pte, expected_pte))
> > > +			break;
> > > +		expected_pte = pte_next_softleaf_offset(expected_pte);
> > > +		ptep++;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return ptep - start_ptep;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * swap_pte_batch - detect a PTE batch for a set of contiguous swap entries
> > >   * @start_ptep: Page table pointer for the first entry.
> > > @@ -577,23 +597,9 @@ static inline void set_softleaf_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > >   */
> > >  static inline int swap_pte_batch(pte_t *start_ptep, int max_nr, pte_t pte)
> > >  {
> > > -	pte_t expected_pte = pte_next_softleaf_offset(pte);
> > > -	const pte_t *end_ptep = start_ptep + max_nr;
> > > -	pte_t *ptep = start_ptep + 1;
> > > -
> > > -	VM_WARN_ON(max_nr < 1);
> > >  	VM_WARN_ON(!softleaf_is_swap(softleaf_from_pte(pte)));
> > 
> > Any reason we cannot simply rename this thing and drop the VM_WARN_ON? I mean, a
> > caller can just do that.
> > 
> 
> Thanks David,
> 
> Agreed on both suggestions.
> 
> I'll add VM_WARN_ON(!softleaf_is_swap(entry) && !softleaf_has_pfn(entry))
> in softleaf_pte_batch() for making sure it has offset/pfn and remove
> swap_pte_batch().
> 
> Best regards,
> Shivank

diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index a5d0488a54dc..31c7c6a04eac 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -561,29 +561,31 @@ static inline void set_softleaf_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 }
 
 /**
- * swap_pte_batch - detect a PTE batch for a set of contiguous swap entries
+ * softleaf_pte_batch - detect a PTE batch for a set of contiguous softleaf entries
  * @start_ptep: Page table pointer for the first entry.
  * @max_nr: The maximum number of table entries to consider.
  * @pte: Page table entry for the first entry.
  *
- * Detect a batch of contiguous swap entries: consecutive (non-present) PTEs
- * containing swap entries all with consecutive offsets and targeting the same
- * swap type, all with matching swp pte bits.
+ * Detect consecutive (non-present) PTEs containing softleaf entries with
+ * consecutive offsets and matching PTE bits. @pte must contain a swap entry or
+ * a softleaf entry carrying PFN.
  *
  * max_nr must be at least one and must be limited by the caller so scanning
  * cannot exceed a single page table.
  *
  * Return: the number of table entries in the batch.
  */
-static inline int swap_pte_batch(pte_t *start_ptep, int max_nr, pte_t pte)
+static inline int softleaf_pte_batch(pte_t *start_ptep, int max_nr, pte_t pte)
 {
-	pte_t expected_pte = pte_next_softleaf_offset(pte);
+	const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pte(pte);
+	pte_t expected_pte;
 	const pte_t *end_ptep = start_ptep + max_nr;
 	pte_t *ptep = start_ptep + 1;
 
 	VM_WARN_ON(max_nr < 1);
-	VM_WARN_ON(!softleaf_is_swap(softleaf_from_pte(pte)));
+	VM_WARN_ON(!softleaf_is_swap(entry) && !softleaf_has_pfn(entry));
 
+	expected_pte = pte_next_softleaf_offset(pte);
 	while (ptep < end_ptep) {
 		pte = ptep_get(ptep);
 
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index c179938097bf..8bed1c58c4bb 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
 
 			if (softleaf_is_swap(entry)) {
 				max_nr = (end - addr) / PAGE_SIZE;
-				nr = swap_pte_batch(pte, max_nr, ptent);
+				nr = softleaf_pte_batch(pte, max_nr, ptent);
 				nr_swap -= nr;
 				swap_put_entries_direct(entry, nr);
 				clear_nonpresent_ptes(mm, addr, pte, nr);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index a3d450d225ad..687796e1af84 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1889,7 +1889,7 @@ static inline int zap_nonpresent_ptes(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 		if (!should_zap_cows(details))
 			return 1;
 
-		nr = swap_pte_batch(pte, max_nr, ptent);
+		nr = softleaf_pte_batch(pte, max_nr, ptent);
 		rss[MM_SWAPENTS] -= nr;
 		swap_put_entries_direct(entry, nr);
 	} else if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
@@ -4758,7 +4758,7 @@ static bool can_swapin_thp(struct vm_fault *vmf, pte_t *ptep, int nr_pages)
 	 * from different backends. And they are likely corner cases. Similar
 	 * things might be added once zswap support large folios.
 	 */
-	if (swap_pte_batch(ptep, nr_pages, pte) != nr_pages)
+	if (softleaf_pte_batch(ptep, nr_pages, pte) != nr_pages)
 		return false;
 	return true;
 }
@@ -5062,7 +5062,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		folio_ptep = vmf->pte - idx;
 		folio_pte = ptep_get(folio_ptep);
 		if (!pte_same(folio_pte, pte_move_softleaf_offset(vmf->orig_pte, -idx)) ||
-		    swap_pte_batch(folio_ptep, nr, folio_pte) != nr)
+		    softleaf_pte_batch(folio_ptep, nr, folio_pte) != nr)
 			goto check_folio;
 
 		page_idx = idx;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-16  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  4:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] mm: batch rmap walks during large folio migration Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: factor out generic PTE batch detection from swap_pte_batch() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  9:57   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-14  8:00     ` Garg, Shivank
2026-08-16  7:48       ` Garg, Shivank [this message]
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/migrate: factor out migration PTE construction Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/migrate: split remove_migration_pte_hugetlb() out of remove_migration_pte() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/migrate: batch the restore-side migration rmap walk Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm/rmap: factor out migration PTE construction Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/rmap: split try_to_migrate_hugetlb_one() out of try_to_migrate_one() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/rmap: batch the unmap of large folios in try_to_migrate_one() Shivank Garg
2026-08-17  9:14   ` Lance Yang
2026-08-18  8:55     ` Miaohe Lin
2026-08-18  9:20       ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89d8c2d6f35f7fdc3444ea3a62ccd244945d9644.camel@amd.com \
    --to=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kinseyho@google.com \
    --cc=kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®