From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
davem@davemloft.net, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Emil Renner Berthing" <kernel@esmil.dk>,
"Minda Chen" <minda.chen@starfivetech.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
"Jan Petrous" <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>,
"Ovidiu Panait" <ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com>,
Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, PKneuper@dspace.de,
"David Laight" <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Validate EEE based on the actual LPI timer value
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:43:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89e242e8ddc78db7531d17a8a8adb904@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910151404.976753-3-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Hi Maxime,
On 10.9.2026 17:13, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> The EEE selftest is a 2-step test :
> - It validates that we enter in LPI mode with the
> irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n counter
> - It then validates that we exit LPI when sending a frame, with the
> irq_tx_path_exit_lpi_mode_n counter.
>
> The current state of the test lacks 2 main things :
>
> - We don't know exactly when was the previous frame sent (it's from
> the
> previous selftest)
>
> - The timeout is hardcoded, while the LPI is entered after a
> user-configurable delay. On top of that, the timeout loop uses a
> pre-decrement iterator (--retries) that actually only iterate nine
> times, so 900ms while the default LPI value is 1 second.
>
> Let's therefore make it more deterministic :
>
> - Send a frame at the beginning of the test
> - Wait for more than the lpi timer value, we timeout after about twice
> the value,
> - Then send another frame, and verify that we do go out of LPI, also
> with a timeout.
>
> Note that the test's goal isn't to validate the LPI timer value itself,
> only that we enter/leave LPI mode.
>
> Fixes: 091810dbded9 ("net: stmmac: Introduce selftests support")
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
> ---
> .../stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_selftests.c | 39 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_selftests.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_selftests.c
> index 6503678b646e..a8280834185c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_selftests.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_selftests.c
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static int stmmac_test_mmc(struct stmmac_priv
> *priv)
> static int stmmac_test_eee(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> {
> struct stmmac_extra_stats *initial, *final;
> - int retries = 10;
> + unsigned long timeout, max_duration;
> int ret;
>
> if (!priv->dma_cap.eee || !priv->eee_active)
> @@ -478,14 +478,21 @@ static int stmmac_test_eee(struct stmmac_priv
> *priv)
> goto out_free_initial;
> }
>
> + /* Snapshot stats, we want to count the in_lpi events. We may enter
> + * LPI just after the packet was sent.
> + */
> memcpy(initial, &priv->xstats, sizeof(*initial));
>
> + /* Send a frame, then wait to enter LPI */
> ret = stmmac_test_mac_loopback(priv);
> if (ret)
> goto out_free_final;
>
> + max_duration = usecs_to_jiffies(2 * priv->tx_lpi_timer);
> +
> /* We have no traffic in the line so, sooner or later it will go LPI
> */
> - while (--retries) {
> + timeout = jiffies + max_duration;
> + while (!time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> memcpy(final, &priv->xstats, sizeof(*final));
>
> if (final->irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n >
> @@ -494,20 +501,38 @@ static int stmmac_test_eee(struct stmmac_priv
> *priv)
> msleep(100);
> }
>
> - if (!retries) {
> + memcpy(final, &priv->xstats, sizeof(*final));
> + if (final->irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n <=
> + initial->irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n) {
> ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> goto out_free_final;
> }
>
> - if (final->irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n <=
> - initial->irq_tx_path_in_lpi_mode_n) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + /* Re-snapshot, as we want to measure exit_lpi events. We should be
> + * in LPI right now.
> + */
> + memcpy(initial, &priv->xstats, sizeof(*initial));
> +
> + /* TX something so we go out of LPI */
> + ret = stmmac_test_mac_loopback(priv);
> + if (ret)
> goto out_free_final;
> +
> + /* Wait for the exit LPI interrupt */
> + timeout = jiffies + max_duration;
> + while (!time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + memcpy(final, &priv->xstats, sizeof(*final));
> +
> + if (final->irq_tx_path_exit_lpi_mode_n >
> + initial->irq_tx_path_exit_lpi_mode_n)
> + break;
> + msleep(100);
> }
>
> + memcpy(final, &priv->xstats, sizeof(*final));
> if (final->irq_tx_path_exit_lpi_mode_n <=
> initial->irq_tx_path_exit_lpi_mode_n) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> goto out_free_final;
> }
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de
Thanks,
Nicolai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 15:13 [PATCH net v2 0/6] net: stmmac: More selftest-related fixes Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 15:13 ` [PATCH net v2 1/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Support running selftests on DSA conduits Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 18:12 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-10 15:13 ` [PATCH net v2 2/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Validate EEE based on the actual LPI timer value Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 17:43 ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
2026-09-10 18:50 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-10 20:52 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 15:14 ` [PATCH net v2 3/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Check the dev->features for S-TAG offload testing Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 18:13 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-10 15:14 ` [PATCH net v2 4/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Capture all packets for vlan checks Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 18:13 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-10 15:14 ` [PATCH net v2 5/6] net: stmmac: size the RX buffers from the frame length, not the MTU Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 18:42 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-10 15:14 ` [PATCH net v2 6/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Account for alignment shift on dwmac1000 for Jumbo test Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-10 18:13 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89e242e8ddc78db7531d17a8a8adb904@tipi-net.de \
--to=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=PKneuper@dspace.de \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=minda.chen@starfivetech.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®