From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757082AbYEOKHc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 06:07:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751699AbYEOKHU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 06:07:20 -0400 Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.57]:12650 "EHLO ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751063AbYEOKHU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 06:07:20 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuIIAF+oK0iWZR7iWmdsb2JhbACSDAEdmzk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,491,1204464600"; d="scan'208";a="112880545" Message-ID: <8ECDBB4EB5394859BFFACAAEE3A6EDB0@uglypunk> From: "Kingsley Foreman" To: "Jarek Poplawski" Cc: "Eric Dumazet" , "Andrew Morton" , , References: <20080515091216.GA6550@ff.dom.local> Subject: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 19:36:54 +0930 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org i just rolled back the kernel to 2.6.24 and im seeing the same thing, I was using 2.6.22 before and didn't see the problem, txqueuelen on the bond0 interface is 0 (the default) -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jarek Poplawski" Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:42 PM To: "Kingsley Foreman" Cc: "Eric Dumazet" ; "Andrew Morton" ; ; Subject: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface > On 15-05-2008 08:16, Kingsley Foreman wrote: > ... >>>>> Ive been using qdisc for quite a while without any problems, >>>>> I just rebuilt a gentoo box with 2.6.25 kernel that does a lot of >>>>> traffic >>>>> ~1000mbits+ over a bonded interface >>>>> >>>>> Im however seeing a big problem with cbq class dropping packets for no >>>>> reason i can see, and it is causing a lot of speed issues. > ... > > Do you mean the same box with the same config but the previous kernel > (2.6.24) doesn't show this problem? BTW, what is txqueuelen on this > bond0? > > Regards, > Jarek P. >