RE: [PATCH] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Support ASUS 2023 laptops with missing DSD

[Luke Jones <luke@ljones.dev>]

On Thu, Aug 24 2023 at 08:31:06 AM +12:00:00, Luke Jones 
<luke@ljones.dev> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> The second member variable in cs35l41_prop_model_table is the SSID to
>> match against.
>> The Lenovo laptops in the initial patch didn't have different SSIDs 
>> so
>> the entry was set to NULL for those.
>> Future entries using CSC3551 MUST always have an accompanying SSID
>> with this entry.
>> Takashi was correct, the implementation is intended to also be used 
>> to
>> patch incorrect DSD.
>> 
>> We have a potential solution to workaround the SPI cs-gpios issue
>> inside here,
>> though the drawback for that is that it only works for laptops with 2
>> SPI amps.
> 
> Can you provide me this so I can test? I have laptops with SPI 2 and 
> 4 speaker setups.

Hi Stefan,

Do you have any further information about the status of this in regards 
to the 2023 laptops?

> 
>> I also took a look at the function for applying DSD properties for 
>> the
>> 2023 ROG laptops.
>> Unfortunately the one-size-fits-all approach will not work, some of
>> these laptops are i2c
>> and some are SPI, meaning the GPIO indexes are different for 
>> different
>> laptops.
> 
> Do you mean "spk-id-gpios"? For all the laptops I know of this seems 
> to be
> Package () { "spk-id-gpios", Package () {
>    SPK1, 0x02, Zero, Zero,
>    SPK1, 0x02, Zero, Zero
> } },
> 
> There is one laptop where it is One not 0x02 (the GA402N)
> 
>> Some of the laptops do no have Speaker IDs.
>> Also, no laptop other than the 2 I added already should ever use
>> CS35L41_EXT_BOOST_NO_VSPK_SWITCH (in fact I believe all these laptops
>> are internal
>> boost anyway).
> 
> Grazie.
> 
>> 
>> We are currently working internally on adding support for the 2023 
>> ROG
>> laptops, so we
>> ask for you guys to hold off on trying to upstream support for these
>> laptops.
> 
> Ah great. Thank you. I apologise for trying to rush things, but I do 
> have a discord server of over 4000 people, many of whom have laptops 
> with cirrus amps.
> 
> For now I'm including a patch in my kernel builds with this mapping:
> 
> const struct cs35l41_prop_model cs35l41_prop_model_table[] = {
> 	{ "CLSA0100", NULL, lenovo_legion_no_acpi },
> 	{ "CLSA0101", NULL, lenovo_legion_no_acpi },
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431433", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GS650P - 
> i2c
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431463", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GA402X - 
> i2c
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431473", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GU604V - 
> spi
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431483", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GU603V - 
> spi
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431493", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GV601V - 
> spi
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431573", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GZ301V - 
> spi
> 	{ "CSC3551", "104317F3", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS ROG ALLY - 
> i2c
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431B93", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G614J - spi
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431CAF", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G634J - spi
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431C9F", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G614JI -spi
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431D1F", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G713P - i2c
> 	{ "CSC3551", "10431F1F", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS H7604JV - 
> spi
> 	{}
> };
> 
> These are the machines I have verified the gpios and such for.

I have a new version of this patch with all listed models confirmed as 
working, and with slightly different settings for some. The only thing 
missing in a solution to the gpio-cs issue.

Can you please provide an update on where you are with ASUS support in 
particular so that I may consider if it is worth my time submitting the 
updated patch.

> 
> Cheers,
> Luke.
> 
>