From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792775590; b=tYu0zfcKJlLF+f+RLcOhY+TK2TvVfs1nO2OjRjJ8KQo5vaVaQciBjgIouYkkvOG5F+BZ LliO4UlZBOZuOWeNYEkrwLR8paDx91yHkJFp5Wy9caynvnzA+xGonprPrQZ5lu9AZbL9z 6ZqzPs2Ryp/Kn+borrvQ9q4sg1iIM8RBt6JRXpGhA7MR0F27DbTjbWyJ/WdSpqIv1CTpB J3Dpyx7V2Z9jjdd9lQe6C0N0roYrTYCymVOOvt59bi1olZTslsADbuuobNkJfIqD5bOdU y3Xlc3OeVoOwvxa+XDFiooYL01lyakXA3YD8h9YEZStH1U8NDFqxNDOBxC9Lcsd6t7w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792775590; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:X-MC-Unique: X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received: X-Received:Received:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:User-Agent: MIME-Version; bh=ZXynH80RO/xGHb0t0bbutsjbUgHko3YWihcoLi5HDZQ=; b=o14o9++bAqkke8VGuCoPSMI6XWrS2ke4SymEqmzsKk4SR2GmUvPjNIzQvRj0p8zbjycb pCUPKRe7dwZ74H5DhgC1P45WohBTT9Y2DWsMji1yagB2SmdMo2OAN/bqVFWyMkzybTN9U E3yxUqJm/sq7q6NRjbxfdYfzRcpOqPITxW3ACZVoG7X4Gf9GCIFf5mWETBLvZ4pUoZdhh ETOcY7mPZ6Yl1B4eJDOUBR3SEpzVvJoRD9Yua8pHzKYm+ZzLZB+7prjZQf5jwqSizTwQY MbetrRZZbrBSkaUqLxck9oyTWdfxrJ/EwyinvwuUT4gV9lDMS23TcPQ/PAKdykWN0Jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Wsj0r7BB; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b="l1/COeyn"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C55C8606A31A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:13:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org C55C8606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Wsj0r7BB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=l1/COeyn DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1792775588; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZXynH80RO/xGHb0t0bbutsjbUgHko3YWihcoLi5HDZQ=; b=Wsj0r7BB81OtIgZmTRH2FOIfrKlRONHM3/8XebWURipUNlcmXRCYPmR1omWLrIjGkORWSu +OpJWdw8vKBrkG5SLWYeHAkxPerl/NeVbmqPZx/7vd0oI/2sbXErGpKFIM+YQ3z3O5P373 wvJZ4y9NYgQgsYTFyGeCdGSSjb9CDA0= Received: from mail-qv1-f70.google.com (mail-qv1-f70.google.com [209.85.219.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-576-PVWjQFHhMxiLyjrTrQTHpA-1; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:13:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: PVWjQFHhMxiLyjrTrQTHpA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: PVWjQFHhMxiLyjrTrQTHpA_1792775584 Received: by mail-qv1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-91c01778cefso24887576d6.2 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1792775584; x=1793380384; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=ZXynH80RO/xGHb0t0bbutsjbUgHko3YWihcoLi5HDZQ=; b=l1/COeyn8zpqacdcvGWkrFo2AFkeDn3bLlWVjWzGnuFiMF6kbZAB8x8HU5jHeeqUsX axgDCMzFz+DXPY0k/VJr8cBQtl0sFW7dRUz394uWvcluL6FhSABDoVqqZAdqMKkdcezR StWODO9EN9G+QELGY1NAouEMc2Zb8LtDnn9o+Xqm63QTpRm5DZ1heKA7aIbEmJW31sAg Nf5Yzm9oDSE8hU8BECUP7MaWcpgpkxLYewRKGohlqWVFcaJeo0L+jazX+N0UUB6nFd2L KJrZumPcx36tOsf10x64Fct4JSzpWc0YPB6IcH9oGaTHL51V+ZUkQFwjD0+B5sGtXDP/ NkdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792775584; x=1793380384; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=ZXynH80RO/xGHb0t0bbutsjbUgHko3YWihcoLi5HDZQ=; b=FGotuIDA3C78Nb2Y3GgBSdnO9hPlMJfr3rySO8Fu+eSloVVMWRa/ARxhdyTuIcE3aI IZVtaJ+SHkpEv+Qn+XEmAyzjnw9v3XCfqYvSMBX0pvIvgO8aWL5cv9h2sUXuwgenJrFl GCCTj9tAqhyVOkY6SWitKAwtXGKioWBLQcWh+TA7nfQ/EbbCkyLV8v0gYHNURD543YU1 636IuII8YyVlHve6c8DYMcCj5eFIlqDgxnbCfuXzQxVnC7nH0DjZwjETi2wUyvsecSFY S+K4/CnSwJXr1+QdC5sCwVjcdbZt0xMtqQe9Rl55g2mMmNRUqiI4Jn/NmlEgU7Wc+GTR cgKw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBw6Sc4puiCuWcqP+HMGgxrZ38a1u74II1rz9nt7lzRKDE3VR6r9PelnqFf/OUS/TXdtXnXnxByNbZpzLGw=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYK2jgW6LoxM2VDioaNXGVCD2Qxqna0rSdmYj5iRJkbTs6VBDpkn 1V95DxhChYUGiNRwpyGEeydkcNUq2Pbwk7CYbh+bQD4tDyr/8Ku5tXhE9tIBPDx4AVgjKAs4zZY e089Bw4cnrgwuxlLnBv59jpqmbogUSxwGnehYYCTB13dGHapA750PKv85atPSDupMTOlQ94RCuA == X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou00JvrKvf0KVQhgTXgHhHFZeSSXVpUW8p06rDdIp2h9y765O3fFPHiRadULCIG 3Q9bUE8hbrhdQ2ur0wo6KjkSiAKFo4ACuYM/1Gb8TQnlSxeovFWviZOLKvCqajvZmzEUl837Pwq ww+L1/cKsUEcx7OBwHKvGkbC31vyTvzGwsIEnVJ3XjxkdeUkbJujQF+0tcDV6s22q2s/7KZ2X7R /nYtwopfDatwN5REIwEIWSBKB00TSiRabjreeIMqPK7wBoUFNOWAOd/Wad16dV3QDHH93PvDKJR xBgaRQLU8Io23ywlYJeF+Y8CAMz6SP99f79HxX4INCJrSXJ/Pn/tyavBwnOSzPS7SgR/OtE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:3d0e:b0:919:7384:99a6 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-91c3a9e79b5mr43112286d6.41.1792775584255; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:3d0e:b0:919:7384:99a6 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-91c3a9e79b5mr43111616d6.41.1792775583760; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.8.4] ([100.0.180.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-91c4522855csm6449066d6.16.2026.10.23.10.13.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Oct 2026 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a025f783533d40c0486a8a511e8811b0e52f466.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: fix GK107 VDPAU regressions From: lyude@redhat.com To: Kush Chandak , Risto Pajula Cc: Danilo Krummrich , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:13:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20261022153712.11208-1-kushc451@gmail.com> References: <20260913201225.5975-1-or.pajula@gmail.com> <20261022153712.11208-1-kushc451@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-2.fc43) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 I am going to look at this patch when I have a moment, but I am in the middle of moving right now so it's likely going to take me a bit, however: On Thu, 2026-10-22 at 21:07 +0530, Kush Chandak wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:12:23 +0300, Risto Pajula wrote: > > This series fixes two independent Nouveau regressions affecting > > VDPAU > > hardware video decoding on NVIDIA GK107 (Kepler). >=20 > Tested-by: Kush Chandak >=20 > I used an AI assistant (Claude) to help debug and test this. Please don't clog up the mailing list with this. I have seen multiple people now going through and 'testing' things with LLMs, and the reality is I'm not going to carry across the tested tags. If you would like to test, there are plenty of resources available to figure out how to build a kernel against a patch on a mailing list to test changes. LLMs frequently hallucinate and lack an understanding of the tasks they perform. It's already difficult enough keeping up with code submissions, and given that you cannot use LLM output without both vetting it, and having the knowledge required to properly vet it, there really is nothing I can actually establish from "testing" like this. If you weren't able to actually test without using an LLM and we have established we can't trust the output of the LLM - how am I supposed to know it was tested? I can't verify it from what you gave me, and even if I could - that's just doing what is way too commonplace with these tools and offloading the work of verifying anything that it spits to others.