From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
andersson@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, bp@alien8.de,
tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: quic_saipraka@quicinc.com, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
james.morse@arm.com, mchehab@kernel.org, rric@kernel.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, quic_ppareek@quicinc.com,
luca.weiss@fairphone.com, ahalaney@redhat.com, steev@kali.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Fix register regions used for LLCC banks
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:58:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a1389f8-ec20-ae85-97b9-599f0c10b8b4@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222131656.49584-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
On 22/12/2022 14:16, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Register regions of the LLCC banks are located at different addresses.
> Currently, the binding just lists the LLCC0 base address and tries to
> cover all the banks using a single size. This is entirely wrong as there
> are other register regions that happen to lie inside the size covered by
> the binding such as the memory controller and holes.
>
> So this needs to be fixed by specifying the base address of individual
> LLCC banks. This approach will break the existing users of this binding
> as the register regions are splitted and the drivers now cannot use
> LLCC0 register region for accessing rest of the banks (which is wrong
> anyway).
>
> But considering the fact that the binding was wrong from the day one and
> also the device drivers going wrong by the binding, this breakage is
> acceptable.
>
> Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-23 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-22 13:16 [PATCH v4 00/16] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Update the maintainers for LLCC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Fix register regions used for LLCC banks Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-23 8:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Fix the base addresses of " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] EDAC/device: Make use of poll_msec value in edac_device_ctl_info struct Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] EDAC/qcom: Add platform_device_id table for module autoloading Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] EDAC/qcom: Do not pass llcc_driv_data as edac_device_ctl_info's pvt_info Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] qcom: llcc/edac: Fix the base address used for accessing LLCC banks Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-28 4:29 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-12-28 6:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-28 9:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-22 13:16 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] qcom: llcc/edac: Support polling mode for ECC handling Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-22 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC banks Andrew Halaney
2022-12-23 3:43 ` Steev Klimaszewski
2022-12-28 4:31 ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-12-28 6:50 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a1389f8-ec20-ae85-97b9-599f0c10b8b4@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_ppareek@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_saipraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=steev@kali.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®