mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: of: Add of_node_put() before return in function
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:41:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a1fa50a-3d1f-427d-c319-be2c6f5ccb6b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190726104547.GA4902@sirena.org.uk>

On 26/07/19 4:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:02:52PM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
>> On 24/07/19 9:17 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 02:02:31PM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> 
>>>> The local variable search in regulator_of_get_init_node takes the value
>>>> returned by either of_get_child_by_name or of_node_get, both of which
>>>> get a node. If this node is not put before returning, it could cause a
>>>> memory leak. Hence put search before a mid-loop return statement.
>>>> Issue found with Coccinelle.
> 
>>>> -		if (!strcmp(desc->of_match, name))
>>>> +		if (!strcmp(desc->of_match, name)) {
>>>> +			of_node_put(search);
>>>>    			return of_node_get(child);
>>>> +		}
> 
>>> Why not just remove the extra of_node_get() and a comment explaining why
>>> it's not needed?
> 
>> I'm sorry, I don't think I understand. I'm putting search in this patch; the
>> program was already getting child. Should I also return child directly
>> instead of getting it again, and continue to put search?
> 
> Your new code is dropping a reference then immediately reacquiring one
> to return it (introducing a race condition along the way).  Why not just
> return the already held reference and not call any functions at all?
> 
I still don't understand.
Previously the function was acquiring a reference to child with 
of_node_get().
My added code is dropping a reference to search, using of_node_put().
I'm probably misunderstanding this at some point, but I thought search 
and child are two different nodes? Or am I completely misunderstanding 
what you're explaining?
Apologies for the confusion.

Thanking you,
Nishka

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-31 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-24  8:32 Nishka Dasgupta
2019-07-24 15:47 ` Mark Brown
2019-07-26  7:32   ` Nishka Dasgupta
2019-07-26 10:45     ` Mark Brown
2019-07-31 13:11       ` Nishka Dasgupta [this message]
2019-07-31 19:08         ` Mark Brown
2019-08-01 13:10 ` Applied "regulator: of: Add of_node_put() before return in function" to the regulator tree Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8a1fa50a-3d1f-427d-c319-be2c6f5ccb6b@gmail.com \
    --to=nishkadg.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome