From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Kohei Enju <enju.kohei@fujitsu.com>, Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 22/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 16:58:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a437df9-a591-4645-9cd8-55fc4f0ed534@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ap49Orng5-oehc6J@FCCLS0092175.localdomain>
Hi Kohei,
On 9/7/26 3:05 PM, Kohei Enju wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On 08/03 14:43, Steven Price wrote:
>> The guest can request that a region of its protected address space is
>> switched between RIPAS_RAM and RIPAS_EMPTY (and back) using
>> RSI_IPA_STATE_SET. This causes a guest exit with the
>> RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE code. We treat this as a request to convert a
>> protected region to unprotected (or back), exiting to the VMM to make
>> the necessary changes to the guest_memfd and memslot mappings. On the
>> next entry the RIPAS changes are committed by making RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS
>> calls.
>>
>> The VMM may wish to reject the RIPAS change requested by the guest. For
>> now it can only do this by no longer scheduling the VCPU as we don't
>> currently have a usecase for returning that rejection to the guest, but
>> by postponing the RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS changes to entry we leave the door
>> open for adding a new ioctl in the future for this purpose.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v15:
>> * Propagate negative error returns.
>> Changes since v14:
>> * Use addition rather than bitwise OR for adding the shared_bit in
>> realm_unmap_shared_range(), this handles the case where the region
>> includes the last address (which means 'end' already has the bit
>> set).
>> Changes since v13:
>> * Switch to the new RMI_RTT_UNPROT_UNMAP range-based API.
>> * Drop ugly hack for RMM bug which errored when the RIPAS was already
>> set to the desired value.
>> Changes since v12:
>> * Switch to the new RMM v2.0 RMI_RTT_DATA_UNMAP which can unmap an
>> address range.
>> Changes since v11:
>> * Combine the "Allow VMM to set RIPAS" patch into this one to avoid
>> adding functions before they are used.
>> * Drop the CAP for setting RIPAS and adapt to changes from previous
>> patches.
>> Changes since v10:
>> * Add comment explaining the assignment of rec->run->exit.ripas_base in
>> kvm_complete_ripas_change().
>> Changes since v8:
>> * Make use of ripas_change() from a previous patch to implement
>> realm_set_ipa_state().
>> * Update exit.ripas_base after a RIPAS change so that, if instead of
>> entering the guest we exit to user space, we don't attempt to repeat
>> the RIPAS change (triggering an error from the RMM).
>> Changes since v7:
>> * Rework the loop in realm_set_ipa_state() to make it clear when the
>> 'next' output value of rmi_rtt_set_ripas() is used.
>> New patch for v7: The code was previously split awkwardly between two
>> other patches.
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h | 6 +
>> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 8 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c | 473 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 484 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> [...]
>> +
>> +static int ripas_change(struct kvm *kvm,
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long ipa,
>> + unsigned long end,
>> + enum ripas_action action,
>> + unsigned long *top_ipa)
>> +{
>> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> + phys_addr_t rd_phys = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
>> + phys_addr_t rec_phys;
>> + struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache = NULL;
>> + long ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (vcpu) {
>> + rec_phys = vcpu->arch.rec.rec_phys;
>> + memcache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache;
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(action != RIPAS_SET);
>> + } else {
>> + WARN_ON(action != RIPAS_INIT);
>> + }
>> +
>> + while (ipa < end) {
>> + unsigned long next = ~0;
>> +
>> + switch (action) {
>> + case RIPAS_INIT:
>> + ret = rmi_rtt_init_ripas(rd_phys, ipa, end, &next);
>> + break;
>> + case RIPAS_SET:
>> + ret = rmi_rtt_set_ripas(rd_phys, rec_phys, ipa, end,
>> + &next);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + switch (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret)) {
>> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
>> + ipa = next;
>> + break;
>> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT: {
>> + int err_level = RMI_RETURN_INDEX(ret);
>> + int level = find_map_level(realm, ipa, end);
>> +
>
> I have been testing this series using TF-RMM from:
> https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-RMM/tf-rmm.git topics/rmm-v2.0-poc_3
>
> I found that Linux repeatedly issues the same SMC_RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS call
> [0], eventually causing a soft lockup [1].
>
> The root cause appears to be an RMM bug fixed by:
> https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TF-RMM/tf-rmm.git/+/38c1de0adf66
>
> Without this fix, RMM returns RMI_ERROR_RTT at level 3. In this case,
> both err_level and level are 3. Since this is RIPAS_SET, the check below
> is skipped, realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, ipa, 3, 3, ...) is a no-op,
> and ipa does not advance. The same RMI is therefore retried
> indefinitely.
>
FYI. This is a known issue, reported previously [1]. Following the discussions
in the thread will lead to the TF-RMM commit you mentioned.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-coco/d0ffbcb5-0cca-4d1e-9788-6b430345fa9b@redhat.com/
Thanks,
Gavin
>> + /*
>> + * If the operation failed at deeper level than
>> + * what is required for the address range, this
>> + * implies encountering an unexpected entry,
>> + * (e.g., RIPAS_DESTROYED), which the RMM prevents
>> + * us from modifying. This is only applicable for
>> + * RMI_RTT_INIT_RIPAS. All the other requests
>> + * are generated by the Realm and thus RMM should
>> + * be able to allow the transition.
>> + */
>> + if (action == RIPAS_INIT && WARN_ON_ONCE(err_level >= level))
>> + return -ENXIO;
>
> Although the root cause is an RMM bug, should we also guard RIPAS_SET
> against this no-progress case?
>
> Thanks,
> Kohei
>
> [0]
> SMC_RSI_VERSION 10000 > RSI_SUCCESS 10000 10001
> SMC_RSI_REALM_CONFIG 830e5000 > RSI_SUCCESS
> SMC_RSI_IPA_STATE_SET 80000000 c0000000 1 0
> SMC_RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS 10060182000 10056e1c000 8000c000 c0000000 > RMI_ERROR_RTT 3
> SMC_RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS 10060182000 10056e1c000 8000c000 c0000000 > RMI_ERROR_RTT 3
> SMC_RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS 10060182000 10056e1c000 8000c000 c0000000 > RMI_ERROR_RTT 3
> ... (the same SMC_RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS call is logged repeatedly)
>
> [1]
> [ 201.945663] CPU: 113 UID: 0 PID: 8093 Comm: kvm-vcpu-0
> [...]
> [ 201.946291] pstate: 61402009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 201.946416] pc : arm_smccc_1_2_smc+0x34/0x70
> [ 201.946430] lr : rmi_smccc_invoke+0xc0/0x108
> [ 201.946442] sp : ffff8000b59ab5e0
> [ 201.946448] x29: ffff8000b59ab690 x28: 000000008313e000 x27: 0000000000000003
> [ 201.946510] x26: 000008241cb3c000 x25: ffffffffffffffff x24: ffff8000b59ab830
> [ 201.946569] x23: ffff8000b59ab7c0 x22: 0000082419daa000 x21: 000008241cb3c000
> [ 201.946701] x20: 00000000000000fb x19: ffff8000b59ab5f8 x18: 0000000000000000
> [ 201.946740] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
> [ 201.947097] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> [ 201.947127] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
> [ 201.947550] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000
> [ 201.947783] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 00000000c0000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
> [ 201.947802] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000304
> [ 201.948305] Call trace:
> [ 201.948438] arm_smccc_1_2_smc+0x34/0x70 (P)
> [ 201.948484] rmi_sro_execute+0x24/0xd0
> [ 201.948571] rmi_rtt_set_ripas.constprop.0+0x6c/0xb0
> [ 201.948698] ripas_change+0xc4/0x1e8
> [ 201.948889] kvm_rec_handle_request+0x190/0x308
> [ 201.948943] check_vcpu_requests+0xcc/0x4f8
> [ 201.948960] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x208/0x7c0
> [ 201.948986] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x174/0xac8
> [ 201.949062] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xb4/0x118
> [ 201.949089] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xa8/0x100
> [ 201.949147] do_el0_svc+0xb8/0xc8
> [ 201.949159] el0_svc+0x48/0x1f8
> [ 201.949169] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa0/0xe8
> [ 201.949194] el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0
>
>> +
>> + ret = realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, ipa, err_level,
>> + level, memcache);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> + /* Retry with the RTT levels in place */
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + default:
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> + ret = -ENXIO;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + if (top_ipa)
>> + *top_ipa = ipa;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_set_ipa_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long end,
>> + unsigned long ripas,
>> + unsigned long *top_ipa)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> + int ret = ripas_change(kvm, vcpu, start, end, RIPAS_SET, top_ipa);
>> +
>> + if (!ret && ripas == RMI_EMPTY && *top_ipa != start)
>> + realm_unmap_private_range(kvm, start, *top_ipa, false);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvm_complete_ripas_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>> + unsigned long base = rec->run->exit.ripas_base;
>> + unsigned long top = rec->run->exit.ripas_top;
>> + unsigned long ripas = rec->run->exit.ripas_value;
>> + unsigned long top_ipa = base;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache,
>> + kvm_mmu_cache_min_pages(vcpu->arch.hw_mmu));
>> + write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> + ret = realm_set_ipa_state(vcpu, base, top, ripas, &top_ipa);
>> + write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> +
>> + if (ret == -ENOMEM) {
>> + /* If no progress, then stop */
>> + if (top_ipa == base)
>> + break;
>> + base = top_ipa;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (WARN_RATELIMIT(ret,
>> + "Unable to satisfy RIPAS_CHANGE for %#lx - %#lx, ripas: %#lx\n",
>> + base, top, ripas))
>> + break;
>> +
>> + base = top_ipa;
>> + } while (base < top);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If this function is called again before the REC_ENTER call then
>> + * avoid calling realm_set_ipa_state() again by changing to the value
>> + * of ripas_base for the part that has already been covered. The RMM
>> + * ignores the contains of the rec_exit structure so this doesn't
>> + * affect the RMM.
>> + */
>> + rec->run->exit.ripas_base = base;
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> int kvm_rec_handle_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>> @@ -224,6 +695,8 @@ int kvm_rec_handle_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rt);
>> }
>> break;
>> + case RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE:
>> + return kvm_complete_ripas_change(vcpu);
>> default:
>> KVM_BUG(1, vcpu->kvm, "Unhandled realm exit_reason");
>> return -ENXIO;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 13:43 [PATCH v16 00/45] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 01/45] firmware: arm_rmm: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 02/45] firmware: arm_rmm: Add wrappers for direct RMI calls Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 03/45] firmware: arm_rmm: Check for RMI support at init Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 04/45] firmware: arm_rmm: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 05/45] firmware: arm_rmm: Add support for SRO Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 06/45] firmware: arm_rmm: Ensure the RMM has GPT entries for memory Steven Price
2026-08-09 6:42 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 07/45] arm64: mm: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2026-08-11 14:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-11 15:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-12 12:42 ` Pavan Kondeti
2026-08-12 13:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-13 10:11 ` Will Deacon
2026-08-13 14:10 ` Pavan Kondeti
2026-08-13 15:28 ` Will Deacon
2026-08-14 8:45 ` Pavan Kondeti
2026-08-14 9:20 ` Will Deacon
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 08/45] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 09/45] KVM: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 10/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add wrappers for realm related RMIs Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 11/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-08-04 14:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-04 14:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 12/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Check for LPA2 support Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 13/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 14/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-09-01 4:07 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-02 15:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-03 4:20 ` Gavin Shan
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 15/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2026-09-01 4:29 ` Gavin Shan
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 16/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Allow passing the machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2026-09-01 4:45 ` Gavin Shan
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 17/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Tear down RTTs Steven Price
2026-08-03 22:29 ` Alper Gun
2026-08-04 12:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-11 14:51 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-13 14:38 ` Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 18/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Allocate and free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 19/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 20/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 21/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2026-08-04 8:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-08-13 14:38 ` Steven Price
2026-08-04 13:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-08-13 14:38 ` Steven Price
2026-08-10 8:03 ` Kohei Enju
2026-08-13 14:38 ` Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 22/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2026-08-05 15:59 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-08-06 8:42 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 5:05 ` Kohei Enju
2026-09-07 6:58 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2026-09-07 7:44 ` Kohei Enju
2026-09-07 10:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-07 11:12 ` Kohei Enju
2026-09-07 11:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-07 11:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 12:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 23/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 24/45] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2026-08-05 16:02 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-08-07 10:12 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 25/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Create the realm descriptor Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 26/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Activate realms on first vCPU run Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 27/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2026-08-06 22:43 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-08-07 10:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 28/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Set RIPAS of initial memslots Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 29/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-08-06 23:11 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-08-11 15:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-12 9:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-12 14:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-12 15:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 30/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Handle realm vCPU load Steven Price
2026-08-10 14:46 ` Kohei Enju
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 31/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Validate register access for Realm VMs Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 32/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 33/45] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 34/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 35/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 36/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 37/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prevent Device mappings for realms Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 38/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Propagate breakpoint and watchpoint counts to userspace Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 39/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 40/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Propagate max SVE vector length from the RMM Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 41/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 42/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Provide register list for unfinalized RECs Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v16 43/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Provide an accurate register list Steven Price
2026-08-03 13:44 ` [PATCH v16 44/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Require ICH_HCR_EL2.TDIR for realms Steven Price
2026-08-10 4:58 ` Kohei Enju
2026-08-10 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-27 12:09 ` Kohei Enju
2026-08-24 14:50 ` Steven Price
2026-08-27 12:45 ` Kohei Enju
2026-08-03 13:44 ` [PATCH v16 45/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Enable realms to be created Steven Price
2026-08-03 15:01 ` [PATCH v16 00/45] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Marc Zyngier
2026-08-03 15:06 ` Steven Price
2026-08-03 15:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-03 15:45 ` Steven Price
2026-08-04 14:24 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-06 22:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-11 4:44 ` Gavin Shan
2026-08-11 11:12 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-12 3:07 ` Gavin Shan
2026-08-12 3:25 ` Alper Gun
2026-08-12 6:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-08-12 10:35 ` Gavin Shan
2026-08-12 12:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a437df9-a591-4645-9cd8-55fc4f0ed534@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®