mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] slub: Force on no_hash_pointers when slub_debug is enabled
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 12:48:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a464fef-0530-aebf-5844-c8aaf2bf6f37@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n50F0E706Hzu9KyR7+7NRG39f0Rn05XT9mi8ci8csenxtQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/2/21 3:03 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Morton (2021-06-01 17:26:59)
>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 06:45:55 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled'
>> >            if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled))
>> >                                        ^
>> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled'
>> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled'
>> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled'
>> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:6: error: invalid argument type 'void' to unary expression
>> >            if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled))
>> >                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Thanks.  Stephen, how about this?
> 
> Looks good to me. Thanks for the quick fix!
> 
>>
>> --- a/mm/slub.c~slub-force-on-no_hash_pointers-when-slub_debug-is-enabled-fix
>> +++ a/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -117,12 +117,26 @@
>>   */
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON
>>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(slub_debug_enabled);
>>  #else
>>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(slub_debug_enabled);
>>  #endif
>> -#endif
>> +
>> +static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void)
>> +{
>> +       return static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled);
> 
> To make this even better it could be
> 
> 	return static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON, &slub_debug_enabled);
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +#else          /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */
>> +
>> +static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void)
>> +{
>> +       return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif         /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */
>>
>>  static inline bool kmem_cache_debug(struct kmem_cache *s)
>>  {
>> @@ -4493,7 +4507,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
>>                 slub_max_order = 0;
>>
>>         /* Print slub debugging pointers without hashing */
>> -       if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled))
>> +       if (__slub_debug_enabled())

A minimal fix would be to put this under #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
and use static_key_enabled() as we don't need the jump label optimization for
init code. But the current fix works.

> 
> It would be super cool if static branches could be optimized out when
> they're never changed by any code, nor exported to code, just tested in
> conditions. I've no idea if that is the case though.
> 
>>                 no_hash_pointers_enable(NULL);
>>
>>         kmem_cache_node = &boot_kmem_cache_node;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01 18:21 [PATCH v3 0/4] slub: Print non-hashed pointers in slub debugging Stephen Boyd
2021-06-01 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] slub: Restore slub_debug=- behavior Stephen Boyd
2021-06-01 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] slub: Actually use 'message' in restore_bytes() Stephen Boyd
2021-06-01 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] slub: Indicate slab_fix() uses printf formats Stephen Boyd
2021-06-06  0:06   ` David Rientjes
2021-06-01 18:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] slub: Force on no_hash_pointers when slub_debug is enabled Stephen Boyd
2021-06-01 22:45   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-02  0:26     ` Andrew Morton
2021-06-02  1:03       ` Stephen Boyd
2021-06-02 10:48         ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-06-02 10:50   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-06-03 13:15   ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-20 14:29   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-20 18:23     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-09-20 18:28       ` Kees Cook
2021-09-20 18:44         ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8a464fef-0530-aebf-5844-c8aaf2bf6f37@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome