From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] sched/fair: stop load tracking when task switched_from_fair()
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 00:35:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a54fbcc-16f5-8b0a-7254-2b14810827b1@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7eae9f41-7b33-2fc1-6b31-bbfd8d7b1364@arm.com>
On 2022/7/15 19:15, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 14/07/2022 15:43, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> On 2022/7/14 20:33, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>> On 13/07/2022 06:04, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> IMHO, a queued !fair task when switching back to fair will already be
>>> enqueued (attached) as a fair task in __sched_setscheduler() prior to
>>> the check_class_changed() call.
>>
>> Right, this is true for a queued !fair task, it will enqueued (attached) before
>> check_class_changed().
>>
>> enqueue_task_fair()
>> enqueue_entity()
>> update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG | DO_ATTACH)
>> if (se->avg.last_update_time && !(flags & SKIP_AGE_LOAD)) --> true
>> __update_load_avg_se(now, cfs_rq, se) --> (1)
>> check_class_changed()
>> switched_to_fair()
>> attach_task_cfs_rq()
>> attach_entity_cfs_rq()
>> update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, sched_feat(ATTACH_AGE_LOAD) ? 0 : SKIP_AGE_LOAD)
>> if (se->avg.last_update_time && !(flags & SKIP_AGE_LOAD)) --> true
>> __update_load_avg_se(now, cfs_rq, se) --> (2)
>>
>>
>> 1. for queued !fair: (1) delta = (now - last_update_time), last_update_time is the time
>> when switched_from_fair().
>>
>> 2. for !queued !fair: (2) delta = (now - last_update_time), last_update_time is the time
>> when switched_from_fair().
>>
>> The scenario in the commit message only cover !queued !fair case, I forget the queued !fair
>> case, their problem is the same.
>
> OK, that makes sense to me then.
>
>>> I can't see how this will work with your proposed change in using
>>> last_update_time=0 for fair->!fair->fair class changes?
>> If we reset last_update_time=0 for !fair task, then:
>>
>> 1. for queued !fair: will not do (1) since the if condition is false.
>>
>> 2. for !queued !fair: will not do (2) since the if condition is false.
> OK.
>
> [...]
>
>>>> This patch reset it's sched_avg last_update_time to 0, stop load
>>>> tracking for !fair task, later in switched_to_fair() ->
>>>> update_load_avg(), we can use its saved sched_avg.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>> index 50f65a2ede32..576028f5a09e 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>> @@ -11552,6 +11552,11 @@ static void attach_task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
>>>> static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>>> {
>>>> detach_task_cfs_rq(p);
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>>> + /* Stop load tracking for !fair task */
>
> You're not really stopping p->se load tracking by doing this. We don't
> do this outside fair anyway. IMHO, you freeze p->se's PELT _avg/_sum
> values to be used as initial values when re-entering fair.
>
Yes, you are right, this comment is misleading and wrong, will delete it.
Thanks very much for your review!
>>>> + p->se.avg.last_update_time = 0;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-13 4:04 [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: task load tracking optimization and cleanup Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] sched/fair: combine detach into dequeue when migrating task Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] sched/fair: update comments in enqueue/dequeue_entity() Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] sched/fair: maintain task se depth in set_task_rq() Chengming Zhou
2022-07-14 12:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-14 13:03 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-18 7:16 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] sched/fair: remove redundant cpu_cgrp_subsys->fork() Chengming Zhou
2022-07-14 12:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-14 13:06 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] sched/fair: reset sched_avg last_update_time before set_task_rq() Chengming Zhou
2022-07-14 12:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-19 8:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] sched/fair: delete superfluous SKIP_AGE_LOAD Chengming Zhou
2022-07-14 12:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-14 13:24 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] sched/fair: use update_load_avg() to attach/detach entity load_avg Chengming Zhou
2022-07-15 11:18 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-15 16:21 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-19 10:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-20 13:40 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-20 15:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-21 13:56 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-21 14:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-19 15:02 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-20 13:43 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] sched/fair: fix load tracking for new forked !fair task Chengming Zhou
2022-07-19 12:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-20 13:48 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] sched/fair: stop load tracking when task switched_from_fair() Chengming Zhou
2022-07-14 12:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-14 13:43 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-07-15 11:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-15 16:35 ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2022-07-19 13:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-27 10:55 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-07-13 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] sched/fair: delete superfluous set_task_rq_fair() Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a54fbcc-16f5-8b0a-7254-2b14810827b1@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®