From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: Make hugetlb mappings go through mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:02:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a57e184-4994-4642-959d-44dc7efbceca@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240729091018.2152-7-osalvador@suse.de>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:10:15AM GMT, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Hugetlb mappings will no longer be special cased but rather go through
> the generic mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags function.
> For that to happen, let us remove the .get_unmapped_area from
> hugetlbfs_file_operations struct, and hint __get_unmapped_area
> that it should not send hugetlb mappings through thp_get_unmapped_area_vmflags
> but through mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags.
>
> Create also a function called hugetlb_mmap_check_and_align() where a
> couple of safety checks are being done and the addr is aligned to
> the huge page size.
> Otherwise we will have to do this in every single function, which
> duplicates quite a lot of code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 8 +++-----
> mm/mmap.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index 9f6cff356796..5d47a2785a5d 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -258,15 +258,22 @@ generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> pgoff, flags);
> }
>
> -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA
> -static unsigned long
> -hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> - unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff,
> - unsigned long flags)
> +unsigned long
> +hugetlb_mmap_check_and_align(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long len, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - return generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> + unsigned long addr0 = 0;
> + struct hstate *h = hstate_file(file);
> +
> + if (len & ~huge_page_mask(h))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if ((flags & MAP_FIXED) && prepare_hugepage_range(file, addr, len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (addr)
> + addr0 = ALIGN(addr, huge_page_size(h));
> +
> + return addr0;
> }
> -#endif
>
> /*
> * Someone wants to read @bytes from a HWPOISON hugetlb @page from @offset.
> @@ -1300,7 +1307,6 @@ static const struct file_operations hugetlbfs_file_operations = {
> .read_iter = hugetlbfs_read_iter,
> .mmap = hugetlbfs_file_mmap,
> .fsync = noop_fsync,
> - .get_unmapped_area = hugetlb_get_unmapped_area,
This is causing a NULL pointer deref error in the mm self-tests,
specifically hugepage-shm.
This is because in __get_unmapped_area(), you check to see if the file has
an f_ops->get_unampped_area() however ('wonderfully'...) the shm stuff
wraps it, so this will be shm_get_unmapped_area() which then accesses the
underlying hugetlb file and _unconditionally_ calls
f_op->get_unmapped_area(), which you just made NULL and... kaboom :)
You can't even add null check in to this wrapper as at this point
everything assumes that you _can_ get an unmapped area. So yeah, it's kinda
broken.
This makes me think the whole thing is super-delicate and you probably need
to rethink this approach carefully, or least _very carefully_ audit users
of this operation.
> .llseek = default_llseek,
> .fallocate = hugetlbfs_fallocate,
> .fop_flags = FOP_HUGE_PAGES,
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 0ec14e5e0890..1413cdcfdb1a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -549,11 +549,9 @@ static inline struct hstate *hstate_inode(struct inode *i)
> }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_HUGETLBFS */
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA
> -unsigned long hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> - unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff,
> - unsigned long flags);
> -#endif /* HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA */
By doing this you are causing an compilation error (at least on my compiler
with an x86-64 defconfig-based build):
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:84:1: error: no previous prototype for
‘hugetlb_get_unmapped_area’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
84 | hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So you need to rethink how you are doing this. I am not sure why we'd leave
these arch-specific bits around unless you're calling into them somehow
elsewhere? But this error suggests you aren't.
> +unsigned long
> +hugetlb_mmap_check_and_align(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long len, unsigned long flags);
>
> unsigned long
> generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 7b623811d82a..f755d8a298c5 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -849,6 +849,7 @@ __get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long)
> = NULL;
>
> + bool is_hugetlb = false;
> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
> if (error)
> return error;
> @@ -857,6 +858,9 @@ __get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (len > TASK_SIZE)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + if (file && is_file_hugepages(file))
> + is_hugetlb = true;
> +
> if (file) {
> if (file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> @@ -874,11 +878,20 @@ __get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>
> if (get_area) {
> addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> - } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
> + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !is_hugetlb) {
> /* Ensures that larger anonymous mappings are THP aligned. */
> addr = thp_get_unmapped_area_vmflags(file, addr, len,
> pgoff, flags, vm_flags);
> } else {
> + /*
> + * Consolidate hugepages checks in one place, and also align addr
> + * to hugepage size.
> + */
> + if (is_hugetlb) {
> + addr = hugetlb_mmap_check_and_align(file, addr, len, flags);
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> + return addr;
> + }
> addr = mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags(current->mm, file, addr, len,
> pgoff, flags, vm_flags);
> }
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Andrew - could we drop this from mm-unstable until Oscar can respin? As
it's causing the mm self tests to kernel panic and I'm using them a lot in
my testing of a new series thanks :>)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/9] Unify hugetlb into arch_get_unmapped_area functions Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm/mmap: Teach generic_get_unmapped_area{_topdown} to handle hugetlb mappings Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] arch/s390: Teach arch_get_unmapped_area{_topdown} " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] arch/x86: Teach arch_get_unmapped_area_vmflags " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] arch/sparc: Teach arch_get_unmapped_area{_topdown} " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] arch/powerpc: Teach book3s64 " Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: Make hugetlb mappings go through mm_get_unmapped_area_vmflags Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 11:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2024-07-31 15:08 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 15:11 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-31 15:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-31 16:04 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-07-31 16:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-08-01 8:14 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-08-01 10:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-08-05 21:03 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-11 13:23 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: Drop hugetlb_get_unmapped_area{_*} functions Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] arch/s390: Clean up hugetlb definitions Oscar Salvador
2024-07-29 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: Consolidate common checks in hugetlb_mmap_check_and_align Oscar Salvador
2024-07-30 9:59 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a57e184-4994-4642-959d-44dc7efbceca@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®