From: "Jianjun Wang (王建军)" <Jianjun.Wang@mediatek.com>
To: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"wenst@chromium.org" <wenst@chromium.org>,
"kernel@collabora.com" <kernel@collabora.com>,
"p.zabel@pengutronix.de" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Ryder Lee <Ryder.Lee@mediatek.com>,
"nfraprado@collabora.com" <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Assert MAC reset only if PHY reset also present
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:44:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a5a695ccbc4401954f7df5a9690af726fc59173.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c55f2c6e-1de8-4248-a52a-d6c9e49b565a@collabora.com>
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 09:50 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 01/03/24 03:48, Jianjun Wang (王建军) ha scritto:
> > Hi Angelo,
> >
> > Thanks for your patch.
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 10:24 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > wrote:
> > > Some SoCs have two PCI-Express controllers: in the case of
> > > MT8195,
> > > one of them is using a dedicated PHY, but the other uses a combo
> > > PHY
> > > that is shared with USB and in that case the PHY cannot be reset
> > > from the PCIe driver, or USB functionality will be unable to
> > > resume.
> > >
> > > Resetting the PCIe MAC without also resetting the PHY will result
> > > in
> > > a full system lockup at PCIe resume time and the only option to
> > > resume operation is to hard reboot the system (with a PMIC cut-
> > > off).
> > >
> > > To resolve this issue, check if we've got both a PHY and a MAC
> > > reset
> > > and, if not, never assert resets at PM suspend time: in that
> > > case,
> > > the link is still getting powered down as both the clocks and the
> > > power domains will go down anyway.
> > >
> > > Fixes: d537dc125f07 ("PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add system PM support")
> > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Rebased over next-20240229
> > >
> > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c | 25
> > > ++++++++++++++-----
> > > --
> > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > > index 975b3024fb08..99b5d7a49be1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > > @@ -874,17 +874,26 @@ static int mtk_pcie_power_up(struct
> > > mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void mtk_pcie_power_down(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> > > +static void mtk_pcie_power_down(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie, bool
> > > is_suspend)
> > > {
> > > + bool suspend_reset_supported = pcie->mac_reset && pcie-
> > > > phy_reset;
> > >
> > > +
> > > clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pcie->num_clks, pcie->clks);
> > >
> > > pm_runtime_put_sync(pcie->dev);
> > > pm_runtime_disable(pcie->dev);
> > > - reset_control_assert(pcie->mac_reset);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Assert MAC reset only if we also got a PHY reset, otherwise
> > > + * the system will lockup at PM resume time.
> > > + */
> > > + if (is_suspend && suspend_reset_supported)
> > > + reset_control_assert(pcie->mac_reset);
> > >
> > > phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
> > > phy_exit(pcie->phy);
> > > - reset_control_assert(pcie->phy_reset);
> > > + if (is_suspend && suspend_reset_supported)
> > > + reset_control_assert(pcie->phy_reset);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int mtk_pcie_setup(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> > > @@ -920,7 +929,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_setup(struct
> > > mtk_gen3_pcie
> > > *pcie)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > err_setup:
> > > - mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie);
> > > + mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie, false);
> > >
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > > @@ -951,7 +960,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_probe(struct
> > > platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > err = pci_host_probe(host);
> > > if (err) {
> > > mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(pcie);
> > > - mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie);
> > > + mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie, false);
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -969,7 +978,7 @@ static void mtk_pcie_remove(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> > >
> > > mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(pcie);
> > > - mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie);
> > > + mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie, false);
> >
> > Is there any reason not to reset the MAC and PHY when probe fails
> > and
> > driver removing? Some SoCs may not have MTCMOS to cut off their
> > power,
> > we need to assert the reset signal to save power in that case.
> >
>
> Sorry for the late reply - yes, there is a reason.
>
> On platforms needing this quirk, resetting at .remove() time will
> hang the
> machine if the module is reinserted later (hence, .probe() called at
> a later
> time).
Does this only happen when the PCIe MAC is reset without resetting the
PHY? Is it related to the reset framework?
Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void mtk_pcie_irq_save(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> > > @@ -1044,7 +1053,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct
> > > device
> > > *dev)
> > > dev_dbg(pcie->dev, "entered L2 states successfully");
> > >
> > > mtk_pcie_irq_save(pcie);
> > > - mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie);
> > > + mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie, true);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1060,7 +1069,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_resume_noirq(struct
> > > device
> > > *dev)
> > >
> > > err = mtk_pcie_startup_port(pcie);
> > > if (err) {
> > > - mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie);
> > > + mtk_pcie_power_down(pcie, false);
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 9:24 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-29 16:20 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-03-01 2:48 ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-03-06 8:50 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-03-08 9:44 ` Jianjun Wang (王建军) [this message]
2024-03-08 13:02 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-03-13 3:33 ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-03-01 6:42 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-03-01 9:06 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-03-01 9:55 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a5a695ccbc4401954f7df5a9690af726fc59173.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=Ryder.Lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®