Re: [RFC][PATCH] uprobe: support for private hugetlb mappings

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 26.04.24 21:55, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> On 26 Apr  9:19, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> A couple of points:
>>
>> a) Don't use page_mapcount(). Either folio_mapcount(), but likely you want
>> to check PageAnonExclusive.
>>
>> b) If you're not following the can_follow_write_pte/_pmd model, you are
>> doing something wrong :)
>>
>> c) The code was heavily changed in mm/mm-unstable. It was merged with t
>> the common code.
>>
>> Likely, in mm/mm-unstable, the existing can_follow_write_pte and
>> can_follow_write_pmd checks will already cover what you want in most cases.
>>
>> We'd need a can_follow_write_pud() to cover follow_huge_pud() and
>> (unfortunately) something to handle follow_hugepd() as well similarly.
>>
>> Copy-pasting what we do in can_follow_write_pte() and adjusting for
>> different PTE types is the right thing to do. Maybe now it's time to factor
>> out the common checks into a separate helper.
> 
> I tried to get the hugepd stuff right but this was the first I heard
> about it :-) Afaict follow_huge_pmd and friends were already DTRT

I'll have to have a closer look at some details (the hugepd writability 
check looks a bit odd), but it's mostly what I would have expected!

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb