From: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
To: Sergey Lebedev <lsa.uz@pm.me>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: soc_button_array: ignored -EPROBE_DEFER loses the buttons on 68% of boots (Surface Pro 11)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:41:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a8a0fcb-1c93-4f0d-bfcd-ae92af0376e0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0fe7a8b6-f3df-4822-a03a-d072b86cdfa8@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 8-Sep-26 23:46, Hans de Goede wrote:
<snip>
>> Why no patch
>> ------------
>>
>> The comment says -EPROBE_DEFER is discarded because Intel uses "virtual
>> GPIOs" that never materialise, so deferring on them would hang the probe
>> forever. A fix has to tell that case apart from a controller that simply has
>> not probed yet, and I do not know which signal you would want to use for
>> that. Guessing would risk reintroducing the problem the workaround exists
>> for.
>>> Happy to test whatever shape you would prefer - the machine is here and I
>> can build and boot kernels on it.
>
> Thank you for your detailed bug report. I've just submitted a patch which
> I believe should fix this:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20260908214410.70422-1-johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
> Please give this a try and confirm if it fixes things.
Shashiko review has lead to a v2 and then a v3 of the fix, please
give v3 a try:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20260909093934.29411-1-johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com/
Regards,
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 14:14 Sergey Lebedev
2026-09-08 21:46 ` Hans de Goede
2026-09-09 9:41 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a8a0fcb-1c93-4f0d-bfcd-ae92af0376e0@kernel.org \
--to=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsa.uz@pm.me \
--cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®