From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B0E22A7EA; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737040261; cv=none; b=eVf9E9KHFWzzNSRoLJ8P82qrhpD2qXMGtnIHUEwkV/d0ZRq3pWwX9+CydeGglxzbkRFIgFWUKX36DabGC2urB8w1NwSjNIgYyQvZZs39nlDScApLAi5Lh5bJHbGkc5VQwZLPii2NU4M0dEj0bC3rFjsXYlFpGYFdUAbcjFEUTWc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737040261; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9kMsm7jJrAx1IN2gYEC8j2oi13whyI4ysY2MoDYfRaw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ueLYPik5lDfaAKsRNpqXcyPYwe3KG4UY5p4CPFHmFjsq/SrYr2mDzA6VzGdTQISogqUL+aXYyco75ejAB53omVr9BV8tMlwjNgBEAyOu3V9Hzaysr1MsrIYYIiWFuuKZMeU8kXMpcyYGh6Gid7QqOyo1eOIjOKlHOMYTC1xnIAY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=n0efISJt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="n0efISJt" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 50GDcZFT005641; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:16 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=9kMsm7 jJrAx1IN2gYEC8j2oi13whyI4ysY2MoDYfRaw=; b=n0efISJtYoPTmwZACD9/JJ XR81H59ZXaOeB7D2dq086jXjSvKCxh9hP/TFVOnwxlEbQsW7CHOpMvtOzcVHauv7 jFhouCJKKMDGucfkTuOeZERwV3IKAqvdy/Rraw8JYwg02apXtvsLP655zsCxLkAX 22ee1523s/7IDZrB7UOOsR0D8vMV0bdCd80YBqnsQIbCrbHK/4WUt8V72eLmGTya v05WwLOmklixfCXLaRWxPwFjR1BqvGyefx8zVF8CmPFuGLmmUXfRW0dcsrEly1hW j4HphjMFuzUAWs3oXxVE3rEMJH+m717ZPb1PqnBazJrZXf0gV9o1MPogpQlT89tw == Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 446tkck4b4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360083.ppops.net (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 50GExBFG017832; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:15 GMT Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 446tkck4av-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 50GDCw1w007994; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:14 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.74]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4443yned0n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:14 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.233]) by smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 50GFADIJ21299764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:14 GMT Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E665B58054; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A815803F; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.61.59.21] (unknown [9.61.59.21]) by smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:11 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <8a9724b0-440f-4647-9505-058717f7ee07@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:10:10 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] dt-bindings: gpio: ast2400-gpio: Add hogs parsing To: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: minyard@acm.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@codeconstruct.com.au, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, eajames@linux.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250114220147.757075-1-ninad@linux.ibm.com> <20250114220147.757075-4-ninad@linux.ibm.com> <20250115142457.GA3859772-robh@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Ninad Palsule In-Reply-To: <20250115142457.GA3859772-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: TC-QwuyWLELS3rwujChq29wvqC7RmVnh X-Proofpoint-GUID: vg3ZPGERppcMA5dqf5ZuhwOkDOxlsLVG X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1057,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-01-16_06,2025-01-16_01,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=717 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2411120000 definitions=main-2501160114 Hi Rob, On 1/15/25 08:24, Rob Herring wrote: > > I was about to say that, but this matches what gpio-hog.yaml defines. > Why we did both, I don't remember. We could probably eliminate > 'hog-[0-9]+' as that doesn't appear to be used much. > > Long term, I want to make all gpio controllers reference a gpio > controller schema and put the hog stuff there. Then we have the node > names defined in 1 place. Ok, choosing suffix. Thanks for the review. Regards, Ninad