mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] KVM: x86: Support interrupt dispatch in x2APIC mode with APIC-write VM exit
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 10:08:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ab5f976-1f3e-e2a5-87f6-e6cf376ead2f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YeG0Fdn/2++phMWs@google.com>

On 1/15/2022 1:34 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022, Zeng Guang wrote:
>> kvm_lapic_reg_read() is limited to read up to 4 bytes. It needs extension to
>> support 64bit read.
> Ah, right.
>
>> And another concern is here getting reg value only specific from vICR(no
>> other regs need take care), going through whole path on kvm_lapic_reg_read()
>> could be time-consuming unnecessarily. Is it proper that calling
>> kvm_lapic_get_reg64() to retrieve vICR value directly?
> Hmm, no, I don't think that's proper.  Retrieving a 64-bit value really is unique
> to vICR.  Yes, the code does WARN on that, but if future architectural extensions
> even generate APIC-write exits on other registers, then using kvm_lapic_get_reg64()
> would be wrong and this code would need to be updated again.
Split on x2apic and WARN on (offset != APIC_ICR) already limit register 
read to vICR only. Actually
we just need consider to deal with 64bit data specific to vICR in 
APIC-write exits. From this point of
view, previous design can be compatible on handling other registers even 
if future architectural
extensions changes. :)
>
> What about tweaking my prep patch from before to the below?  That would yield:
>
> 	if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
> 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset != APIC_ICR))
> 			return 1;
>
> 		kvm_lapic_msr_read(apic, offset, &val);

I think it's problematic to use kvm_lapic_msr_read() in this case. It 
premises the high 32bit value
already valid at APIC_ICR2, while in handling "nodecode" x2APIC writes 
we need get continuous 64bit
data from offset 300H first and prepare emulation of APIC_ICR2 write. At 
this time, APIC_ICR2 is not
ready yet.

> 		kvm_lapic_msr_write(apic, offset, val);
> 	} else {
> 		kvm_lapic_reg_read(apic, offset, 4, &val);
> 		kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, offset, val);
> 	}
>
> I like that the above has "msr" in the low level x2apic helpers, and it maximizes
> code reuse.  Compile tested only...
>
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:29:34 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Add helpers to handle 64-bit APIC MSR read/writes
>
> Add helpers to handle 64-bit APIC read/writes via MSRs to deduplicate the
> x2APIC and Hyper-V code needed to service reads/writes to ICR.  Future
> support for IPI virtualization will add yet another path where KVM must
> handle 64-bit APIC MSR reads/write (to ICR).
>
> Opportunistically fix the comment in the write path; ICR2 holds the
> destination (if there's no shorthand), not the vector.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index f206fc35deff..cc4531eb448f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -2787,6 +2787,30 @@ int kvm_lapic_set_vapic_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t vapic_addr)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +static int kvm_lapic_msr_read(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u64 *data)
> +{
> +	u32 low, high = 0;
> +
> +	if (kvm_lapic_reg_read(apic, reg, 4, &low))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	if (reg == APIC_ICR &&
> +	    WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_lapic_reg_read(apic, APIC_ICR2, 4, &high)))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	*data = (((u64)high) << 32) | low;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_lapic_msr_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u64 data)
> +{
> +	/* For 64-bit ICR writes, set ICR2 (dest) before ICR (command). */
> +	if (reg == APIC_ICR)
> +		kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, APIC_ICR2, (u32)(data >> 32));
> +	return kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, reg, (u32)data);
> +}
> +
>   int kvm_x2apic_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
>   {
>   	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> @@ -2798,16 +2822,13 @@ int kvm_x2apic_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
>   	if (reg == APIC_ICR2)
>   		return 1;
>
> -	/* if this is ICR write vector before command */
> -	if (reg == APIC_ICR)
> -		kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, APIC_ICR2, (u32)(data >> 32));
> -	return kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, reg, (u32)data);
> +	return kvm_lapic_msr_write(apic, reg, data);
>   }
>
>   int kvm_x2apic_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
>   {
>   	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> -	u32 reg = (msr - APIC_BASE_MSR) << 4, low, high = 0;
> +	u32 reg = (msr - APIC_BASE_MSR) << 4;
>
>   	if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) || !apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
>   		return 1;
> @@ -2815,45 +2836,23 @@ int kvm_x2apic_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
>   	if (reg == APIC_DFR || reg == APIC_ICR2)
>   		return 1;
>
> -	if (kvm_lapic_reg_read(apic, reg, 4, &low))
> -		return 1;
> -	if (reg == APIC_ICR)
> -		kvm_lapic_reg_read(apic, APIC_ICR2, 4, &high);
> -
> -	*data = (((u64)high) << 32) | low;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return kvm_lapic_msr_read(apic, reg, data);
>   }
>
>   int kvm_hv_vapic_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 reg, u64 data)
>   {
> -	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> -
>   	if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
>   		return 1;
>
> -	/* if this is ICR write vector before command */
> -	if (reg == APIC_ICR)
> -		kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, APIC_ICR2, (u32)(data >> 32));
> -	return kvm_lapic_reg_write(apic, reg, (u32)data);
> +	return kvm_lapic_msr_write(vcpu->arch.apic, reg, data);
>   }
>
>   int kvm_hv_vapic_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 reg, u64 *data)
>   {
> -	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> -	u32 low, high = 0;
> -
>   	if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
>   		return 1;
>
> -	if (kvm_lapic_reg_read(apic, reg, 4, &low))
> -		return 1;
> -	if (reg == APIC_ICR)
> -		kvm_lapic_reg_read(apic, APIC_ICR2, 4, &high);
> -
> -	*data = (((u64)high) << 32) | low;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return kvm_lapic_msr_read(vcpu->arch.apic, reg, data);
>   }
>
>   int kvm_lapic_set_pv_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, unsigned long len)
> --

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-15  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-31 14:28 [PATCH v5 0/8] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] x86/cpu: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Zeng Guang
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2022-01-13 21:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14  4:19     ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-20  1:06       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-20  5:34         ` Zeng Guang
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] KVM: x86: Support interrupt dispatch in x2APIC mode with APIC-write VM exit Zeng Guang
2022-01-13 21:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14  7:52     ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-14 17:34       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-15  2:08         ` Zeng Guang [this message]
2022-01-18  0:44           ` Yuan Yao
2022-01-18  3:06             ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-18 18:17           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-19  2:48             ` Zeng Guang
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2022-01-13 21:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14  5:36     ` Zeng Guang
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] KVM: VMX: Update PID-pointer table entry when APIC ID is changed Zeng Guang
2022-01-05 19:13   ` Tom Lendacky
2022-01-06  1:44     ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-06 14:06       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-01-07  8:05         ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-07  8:31           ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-10  7:45             ` Chao Gao
2022-01-10 22:24               ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 22:19                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14  2:58                   ` Chao Gao
2022-01-14  8:17                     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-17  3:17                       ` Chao Gao
2022-02-02 23:23                   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-03 20:22                     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23  6:10                       ` Chao Gao
2022-02-23 10:26                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-14  0:22               ` Yuan Yao
2021-12-31 14:28 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] KVM: VMX: Resize PID-ponter table on demand for IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2022-01-13 22:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14 15:59     ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-14 16:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-17 15:04         ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-18 17:15           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-19  7:55             ` Zeng Guang
2022-01-20  1:01               ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-24 16:40                 ` Zeng Guang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ab5f976-1f3e-e2a5-87f6-e6cf376ead2f@intel.com \
    --to=guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome