Re: [PATCH] drivers: cpuidle: assign enter_freeze to same as enter callback function

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On 10/11/16 10:28, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 9 November 2016 at 19:48, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/11/16 18:39, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

[..]

>>> I would just init the enter_freeze() pointer and be done with that,
>>> adding code to check whether the idle back-end enables IRQs when it
>>> enters idle is a major PITA that really is not worth the hassle and
>>> apart from coupled C-states (which we do not support in DT as you said)
>>> I can't find another example (and on top of that it is not even
>>> something we can solve through DT since it is not a property of the idle
>>> state but more related to its kernel implementation).
>>>
>>
>> Makes sense, I was just trying to avoid setting for a state like
>> CPU/Cluster retention but I agree, we need not do that.
>
> I agree with Lorenzo and would prefer to keep it simple
>

Sure I will respin accordingly.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep