From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E80C1C2BD; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713863200; cv=none; b=VJr4LcWOOOwlqo8Bxs9QYLLMw8nNUcc1+UEJN1Tgef7yQXHHnZZV+V0SwqnI4syxgYKVoFM+MeHDWo1LXy4EzoC7KyFICk0EyQ9utSRzfND9UTi1eVZgzwm4dGf4MhHQeYivHylR8jVwz9xyrGc0fLuBOlfZAf+WNaBR4ZDt9PM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713863200; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hBMX3crxCRLA2bQd9l2D7waR99WWWl46lNZUjk53ts0=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Oryk4LW914T3akavsnoG/il/IRnbHO1UMGQK7rZ5FwbkMsse/Yh6IOz4mHFHOnP3Io7t78/zyw+yxPnjjs+VC2OMxZT97FEUiee9MtKv5g7Fi5nDmxjbKE54FREBTo1w/KZlQHH0esFbRGajDkMtvAsSwgYJALahpHHjdK3cpaM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=iflF0VWL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="iflF0VWL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=hBMX3crxCRLA2bQd9l2D7waR99WWWl46lNZUjk53ts0=; t=1713863197; x=1715072797; b=iflF0VWLqfuD3fFaVwfDhsg8z6c7P/9mudHKdMY5qoCDiPk gaNPGc/9BzQzAupMqpPP2Ld2YGcjxL9j23HABx8mgWmxOXhZcRpFv0tfrk0g2KeERZ5+9Ci0r7B9K 6QYt0y3IkHhFxcUa6CbMnbCUnyn5OWnFj827+aO2XK6J6dlQq0x5RINGxhO6YUG6RY3auo5zvRmDa NshXI2Tuc5ypdvZBohpFBLIieOq+9CcaVMyaxPvt91q+8RCl6NFJES7cR/YZG9QiaJDnio4vQPE7e xSbN7LgmBRJWJnx9ubLzLj4Kgz9UXxjqL2/rGl+UhP6WaiqadI9VwcPzA6gXnssw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rzC6d-0000000214s-2LmM; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: <8ab88be5de30bcbd0d1cac3cfde6b2085dcfc8fb.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: 6.9.0-rc2+ kernel hangs on boot (bisected, maybe LED related) From: Johannes Berg To: Linux regressions mailing list , Miri Korenblit Cc: LKML , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Ben Greear , Lee Jones Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:06:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <30f757e3-73c5-5473-c1f8-328bab98fd7d@candelatech.com> <30819e01-43ce-638f-0cc6-067d6a8d03c7@candelatech.com> <89a9eec3-337f-3c9f-6bbe-00a26a15287c@candelatech.com> <20240411070718.GD6194@google.com> <8736ebc8881e1e0cabfbbf033725a3123a5e8e90.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 (3.50.4-1.fc39) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 11:00 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 16.04.24 08:17, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 13:37 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > >=20 > > > Johannes, you had another suggestion: changing iwlwifi's request_modu= le() to request_module_nowait() in > > > iwl_req_fw_callback() > > >=20 > > > Is that still best thing to try in your opinion? > >=20 > > I guess so, I don't have any better ideas so far anyway ... >=20 > [adding the iwlwifi maintainer; thread starts here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/30f757e3-73c5-5473-c1f8-328bab98fd7d@candela= tech.com/ >=20 > ] >=20 > Johannes, Miri, what's the status wrt to this regression? From here > things look somewhat stalled -- but maybe there was progress and I just > missed it. What do you want? It got bisected to an LED merge, but you ping _us_? Way to go ... johannes