From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752679AbdAYWmB (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:42:01 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([65.50.211.136]:46258 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752659AbdAYWl7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:41:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/crypto: fix %progbits -> @progbits To: Denys Vlasenko , Herbert Xu References: <20170119212805.18049-1-dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Xiaodong Liu , Megha Dey , George Spelvin , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Message-ID: <8ad0ec8d-a7d2-b4ca-df7d-3b670b468baf@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:37:08 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170119212805.18049-1-dvlasenk@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/19/17 13:28, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > %progbits form is used on ARM (where @ is a comment char). > > x86 consistently uses @progbits everywhere else. However, it looks like %progbits works on all architectures (at least include/linux/init.h seems to imply so.) Perhaps a tree-wide replacement the other way would make more sense. Personally I would also like to see these parameters macroized, to keep someone from getting them wrong, just like we have __INIT, __INITRODATA etc already, we should just have plain __TEXT __DATA __BSS... -hpa